Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,~ <br /> <br />MINUTES <br />COUNCIL HEARINGS PANEL <br />MAY 15, 1978 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />C.B. 1675--Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer and storm sewer within <br />Panorama View III Subdivision, paving Shields Avenue from east boundary <br />of Panorama View JII to 60 feet east; and sanitary sewer within 160 <br />feet west of Panorama View III (1387--77-46) <br /> <br />No letters of protest or requests to be heard were received. <br /> <br />C.B. 1676--Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer and storm sewer within <br />Candlelight Park 3rd Addition (1353--77-50) <br /> <br />No letters of protest or requests to be heard were received. <br /> <br />C.B. 1677--levying assessments for sanitary sewer; Norkenzie Road from Green Acres <br />Road to Holly Avenue (1492--77-54) <br /> <br />No letters of protest or requests to be heard'were received. <br /> <br />Mr. Teitzel stated that although there were no requests to be heard before the <br />panel on any of the assessment projects, there were apparently people in the <br />audience who wished to be heard. <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley called for testimony from the audience in this matter. <br /> <br />Terry Coss of 2032 Greiner Street spoke, stating that he owned property at <br />4851 Avalon Street and had received an assessment on Project No. 77-09, Briarwood <br />Subdivision. He stated that when he had purchased the property the builder had <br />assured him that all assessments had been paid. He stated he was at the hearing <br />to find out if there had been a mistake. <br /> <br />Mr. Teitzel stated that the assessment was within the subdivision and if the lot <br />was sold with representation that the assessments were paid it should be taken <br />up with the person who sold the lot to him. Mr. Teitze1 further stated that the <br />City is required by law to make the assessment against the current owner of the <br />property. ' <br /> <br />Mr. lieuallen stated he was not an expert, but he felt the matter should be <br />taken up with the title insurance company or with the prior owner of the home. <br />He stated that he felt the City had not been remiss in this matter. <br /> <br />It was moved by Mr. lieual1en and seconded by Mr. Bradley to recommend that the <br />assessments on C.B. 1668 to 1677 be levied as proposed. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />," <br /> <br />~~ <br />