Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br />IV. CONSIDERATION OF ISSUE RE: FORt~TION OF ECONOMIC IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION-- <br />e Memo and proposed bylaws distributed. <br /> Manager said the purpose of the Council discussion today was to provide <br /> guidance to the Council representative, Eric Haws, to the L-COG Board <br /> which is now considering bylaws for the formation of the Economic Improve- <br /> ment Commission {EIC}. Issues of concern were identified for council: <br /> The one man, one vote rule; financing; staff assistance and creation of <br /> the EIC, and appointment of a director. <br /> Regarding the voting power, some members of the L-COG Board feel that by <br /> invoking the one man, one vote rule, E~ene would have too much potential <br /> authority in decision-making process. anager su~gested the Council could <br /> use a one vote per 5000 or even one vote per 10,000 population. The <br /> effect of using a process by enlarging the number of persons represented <br /> would reduce the numerical vote influence of the larger units of government. <br /> On the basis of a one vote per 1,UUU population, Eugene and Springfield <br /> combined would have 52 percent of the votes cast; on the basis of one vote <br /> per 5,OUO population, combined Eugene-Springfield would have 45 percent. <br /> Regarding the formation of the EIC, Lane County wants initially to provide <br /> the staff work and financing. However, City staff feels L-COG should <br /> provide the initial formation of the staff and that all jurisdictions <br /> should contribute financially. The information distributed did not address <br /> the question as to why some groups are altogether against formation of EIC. <br /> However, Eugene is increasingly interested in the formation because it <br /> would qualify for EDA grants and the City is seeking a higher level of <br />e commitment for economic planning in the County and more particularly <br /> for all governments. One of the roles of the commission would be to <br /> annually develop an overall economic plan for the area, which is now being <br /> done by LCOG. Regarding EDA grants, Manager said the city is now seeking <br /> such for the Civic Center auditorium development. <br /> Mr. Delay said he was not encouraged about moving away from the stance of <br /> a population-based representation. He said after 1979, the City of Eugene <br /> would have about six persons which would give it 30 percent of the vote on <br /> a strict membership basis. Springfield would have 10 percent, giving <br /> these two jurisdictions 40 percent of the vote representing 60 percent of <br /> the population. However, the County would have 6U percent of the vote <br /> representing 4U percent of the population. He continued further that the <br /> actual control would be by the two rural County Commissioners who would <br /> have control over selection of nine members. Regarding the undue power <br /> for the City, he felt the concern was the exact opposite: Are Eugene and <br /> Springfield adequately represented? He felt the issue was to ensure the <br /> jurisdictions are comfortable that actions will not be taken that will be <br /> counter-productive to the jurisdictions. He thus felt the one man, one <br /> vote was the best assurance. <br /> Mayor Keller felt that to be the best approach, noting it was the Council's <br /> responsibility to Eugene citizens. He noted also that vote had not been <br /> invoked in the seven-year experience with L-COG. Assistant Manager said <br /> the one man, one vote had been included in 1971 as part of Federal regula- <br /> tions. <br />e <br /> 6/14/78 - 5 <br /> ~~3 <br />