My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/26/1978 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1978
>
06/26/1978 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 2:06:30 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:29:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/26/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Mr. Bradley said he had heard the emphasis on priority of saving <br />e lives. He felt in that light, passing the ordinance would be a <br /> relaxation of sprinkler systems and lives would be more protected by <br /> the present ordinance. He was going to vote no on the ordinance for <br /> that reason, although he did favor the other proposals. Assistant <br /> Manager noted the proposal of requiring smoke detectors is really a <br /> warning system that sprinkler systems do not provide. He felt it <br /> tended to be more a trade-off than a relaxation of present standards. <br /> Mr. Delay encouraged Mr. Bradley to reconsider his stance. He said <br /> there may be a relaxation in costs, but not in reasonable protection, <br /> and Council had a commitment to protect the health and safety of the <br /> citizens. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion which carried unanimously and the <br /> bill was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that the bill be <br /> approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors <br /> pesent voting aye, except Mr. Williams voting no, the bill was <br /> declared passed and numbered 18213. <br /> Assistant Manager noted the amendments as suggested by Council and Ms. <br /> Niven would be brought back before Council at the July 10 meeting for <br /> consideration. <br /> A short recess was taken. <br />e B. Appeal of Hearings Official Diagrammatic Approval, Located East of <br /> Fairway Loop and South of Eastwood Lane (Fairway Loop PUO) (PO 78-7) <br /> Approved by Hearings Official May 9, 1978. Jim Saul, planner, said <br /> the proposed PUD involves 65 units on 6.9 acres located behind (west) <br /> of Reed & Cross. Diagrammatic approval was granted May 19, 1978, <br /> subject to conditions. The only issue raised in the appeal involved a <br /> change in the location of traffic diverter on Fairway Loop. Diverters <br /> presently are installed at Eastwood and Southwood on Fairway Loop to <br /> prevent southbound travel. The Traffic Engineer recommended, and the <br /> Hearings Official adopted the recommendation, that the southerly <br /> diverter be moved northward a sufficient distance to allow southbound <br /> movement from this development on Fairway Loop to Southwood. That <br /> shift would not change the basic status of Fairway Loop, since overall <br /> southbound traffic would still be precluded. However, if that change <br /> were not made, all of the traffic from this development would have to <br /> exit onto Eastwood Lane. The appellants o~ect to this modification <br /> of the existing diverters. He noted that with the present zoning the <br /> development could accommodate up to ten units per acre. Mr. Saul <br /> distributed a map to Council to explain the change in the diverter <br /> system, with the exits for the proposed development. He noted that <br /> Condition No.1 of the Findings and Conclusion of the Hearings Official <br /> made approval contingent upon subsequent review of the change in <br /> traffic. Council is limited to the sole issue in the appeal of the <br />- <br /> 6/26/78--7 <br /> 4~1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.