My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/06/1978 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1978
>
09/06/1978 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 12:10:08 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:30:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/6/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> J <br /> Res. No. 2996--~commending to Boundary Commission the transfer of <br /> certain property from the jurisdiction of Eugene to e <br /> Springfield was read by number and title. <br /> Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to adopt the resolution. <br /> Ro 11 call vote. Motion carried unanimously. <br />VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to aoorove minutes of <br /> August 30, 1978. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. <br />VI I. DISCUSSION OF PROPERTY TAX LIMITATION PROPOSALS--Outline materials <br /> distributed. <br /> In discussing the process, Paget Engen explained the House and Senate <br /> had reappointed the committee of 21 legislators who had met last week <br /> to prepare a package for legislative consideration. All bills are now <br /> being introduced on the House side. The House portion of the committee <br /> is meeting to hear the bills, with the Senate sitting in. The House <br /> committee will make amendments, act on those, and send the entire package <br /> to the floor for House approval and passage to the Senate. Next, the <br /> Senate will send the package back to the same subcommittee for hearings, <br /> action, and then send it back to the floor of the Senate. If the version <br /> is the same as proposed by the House, the package will then be adooted. <br /> If there are differences, presumably the differences will be worked out <br /> by a committee. <br /> She said today the joint committee is holding public hearings and a work e <br /> session is scheduled for 2:30. The public hearings have included general <br /> citizen input and other legislators, who are not members of the committee, <br /> presenting their ideas. <br /> She said the committee was working with Governor vetoes, and there seemed <br /> to be quite a number of overrides operating. She felt those should be <br /> completed today. <br /> The outline which had been distributed to Council included all the <br /> provisions in the package from the subcommittee which met last week. <br /> She gave no predictions on any changes. However, she indicated there <br /> would undoubtedly be some provisions for renters; and that some state <br /> and local limitations would be included. <br /> Mayor Keller wondered if there had been anything done which would tie the <br /> growth of local governments to what the State is doing for itself. Ms. <br /> Engen said that idea is generating support. However, she said the big <br /> issue today was the difference between the Governor's original proposal of <br /> a $25,000 homestead exemption, as opposed to the proposal in the Legislature <br /> now of the State paying one half of property taxes up to $1,500 limit. <br /> e <br /> ~II 9/6/78--8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.