My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/25/1978 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1978
>
09/25/1978 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 11:28:44 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:30:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/25/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> . <br /> Mr. Lieuallen moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to communicate to <br /> State and Federal agencies opposition to continued use of TCDD <br /> e containing herbicides as a tool for land management. <br /> Mr. Lieuallen said in his reading of literature, he feels there is a <br /> health hazard associated with use of the herbicide, in spite of <br /> industry's care. He felt it important to notify EPA about Council.s <br /> feelings, and that EPA should attempt to find a way to deal with <br /> the problems associated with the use of herbicides. <br /> Mr. Delay said it was obvious there are serious questions related <br /> to the issue, in that the EPA is going through the RPAR process, <br /> and research has raised questions about the substance. He felt <br /> Council must recognize the seriousness of the matter in adopting its <br /> previous motion on local water supply. He felt when there are serious <br /> and legitimate concerns about toxic substances in the water supply, it <br /> would be prudent for Council to take a cautious stance. <br /> - <br /> Mr. Obie suggested modifyi ng the motion to el iminate "opposition" <br /> and insert "grave concern," and ask EPA to expedite the completion of <br /> the RPAR process. He wondered if Mr. Lieuallen could support that <br /> change. Ms. Smith concurred with Mr. Obie. <br /> Mr. Lieuallen was inclined to decline Mr. Obie.s offer. He fe 1 t <br /> his motion would communicate the concern of the citizens of Eugene, , <br /> and put pressure on the industries to consider manual alternatives. <br /> He wished Council to take a strong stand, noting the slowness of <br /> e bureaucracy and felt the strong position from Council would put <br /> additional pressure. <br /> Mayor Keller indicated he would have a problem supporting "opposition." <br /> He noted the amount of material received and presented to Council, <br /> and the recent tour of Weyerhauser Tree Farm, which demonstrated the <br /> use of herbicides versus manual clearing. He felt he was not in a <br /> position to actually oppose anything. He was concerned that reference <br /> to the EPA RPAR process is an indication of guilt, when he felt it is <br /> simply a request for review. He also felt confident that EWEB was <br /> going to continue to provide a good water supply for our citizens. <br /> Also, he noted great respect for the forest industry and felt they <br /> could ill afford a huge lawsuit for negligence. > <br /> Mr. Obie appreciated the legitimate concerns on this subject. He <br /> felt there were scientists and experts who had opinions on both <br /> sides of the issue. He did not feel this was a political issue, but <br /> a scientific one. <br /> Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to strike the word "opposi- <br /> tion" and insert "grave concern" and further, to request EPA to <br /> expedite the RPAR process on this issue. <br /> Mr. Lieuallen felt he could accept that compromise, as he would <br /> like to see consensus expressed by the Council. <br /> e <br /> 9/20/78--9 <br /> b....2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.