10/09/1978 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. is a close neighbor to the proposed panhandle. He said errors had been committed by the applicant and the map did not show the rental property. There was some question as to the actual dimensions of the -- property. Mr. Bonnett did support a two lot panhandle, but not a triple panhandle lot. Mr. Saul recognized the concerns of the neighbors regarding sewers and traffic. He said neither the Planning Department's nor the Planning Commission's actions were predicated on those grounds. Council has findings before it indicating the Planning Department recognized a one-lot panhandle for the site. Mr. Lieuallen asked how the South Hills Study would be violated by this request. Mr. Saul said that was a judgment and directed Council to the written material before it regarding slopes and heavily wooded areas. He said the application was deficient as it did not show the number of off-street parking spaces nor the impact the two lots would have. He said it would create excessive removal of vegetation and change of the slopes. Mrs. Goldstein, in rebuttal, said she had looked over the area where a driveway could be located and felt this could be done without dis- turbing any of the major trees. Four off-street parking spaces would not be impossible. She said in regard to traffic safety and sewers, the objectors could check with the City. She felt the inconveniences would be about the same for two as for three lots. She fel t the Council's political decisions about infilling and compact growth should be followed. She noted the yard is 90 yards long, according to a survey being done. . Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony presented. Mr. Saul said the three bases for denying the application were: 1) Zoning density would be violated; 2) relationship to the South Hills Study; and 3) relationship to the size of adjacent properties. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, to deny the appeal and adopt findings of fact. Motion carried with all Councilors voting aye, exce~t Mr. Bradley voting no. E. Appeal of Condition Imposed by Planning Department for Horizon West Fi.rst Addition Subdivision (S 78-12), located on east side of Hawkins Lane, south of 25th Avenue RESCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING TO OCTOBER 23, 1978. F. Liquor License New Outlet: Poppi's (RMB), 675 East 13th Applicants: Richard and Calliope Cottam Manager noted all papers were in order and staff recommended for- warding approval to OLCC subject to conditions from the Building Department (any remodel or alteration will require building permits) and Fire Department (installation of two smoke detectors and removal e of burlap materials from ceiling). 10/9/78--12 fall