Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ <br /> . <br /> tk. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, that findings supporting <br /> e the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes <br /> and mi nutes of November 20, 1 9 78, be adopted by reference thereto; <br /> that the bill be read the second time by council bill number <br /> only, with unanimous consent of the Council; and that enactment <br /> be considered at this time. <br /> Mr. Lieuallen expressed concern regarding wildlife in the area and <br /> the question of site review. He felt it important Council consider <br /> rezoning separately from any proposed development. He felt site <br /> review would give more control for whatever project developed <br /> on the property. Mr. Saul said site review would be predicated <br /> solely upon the nature of the property on the south side, and concerned <br /> preserving the value of the natural habitat. Evidence was limited to <br /> what is in the Planning Commission minutes. He said research had been <br /> done following the Planning Commission hearing, and it was noted that <br /> as part of the update of the General Plan, an inventory of wildlife <br /> areas in the Metropolitan Area would be done. Protection for the <br /> special areas would be recommmended. Mr. Saul noted this particular <br /> piece of property was not included in that list. He said, thus, it <br /> seemed no particular purpose would served to attach site review. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion which carried unanimously and the <br /> bill was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, that the bill be approved <br /> and given final passage. Ro 11 ca 11 vote. Motion carried unani- <br /> e mously and the bill was numbered 18312. <br /> II. ORDINANCES FOR SECOND READING <br /> Manager said a request had been received for testimony before Council <br /> on Council Bill 1800 regarding assessments on South Shasta Loop (contract <br /> 77-52) . He noted the parties involved had been legally notified of <br /> the Panel Hearing December 4, but did not respond and request a hearing <br /> before the Panel at that time. It would be necessary for Council, by a <br /> two-thirds vote, to authorize further discussion of the matter at this <br /> time. <br /> Don Allen, Public Works Director, said at this point staff was not sure <br /> what the issue was. <br /> Betty Smith, a member of the Hearings Panel, said the Panel had not <br /> met December 4, because there were no requests for testimony. People <br /> were notified and chose not to attend to present their objections. <br /> Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to open public testimony <br /> on Council Bill 1800 for 10 minutes. <br /> e <br /> 12/11/78--5 <br /> "0 <br />