Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Obie wondered regarding local governmental exemptions, what <br />was included in "public corporation." Ms. Benjamin replied the a <br />statutory language used refers to local governmental agencies. .., <br />Examples such as Lane Community College and Lane County would be <br />included. However, the State of Oregon and Federal government would <br />not be, in the sense being used in this definition. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />Harris Hoffman, 1252 West 12th Avenue, represented Joe Green Associ- <br />ates. It was requested that Council reconsider exempting from the <br />systems development tax the downtown core area. His clients were <br />involved in a condominium development at 10th and Lincoln to increase <br />a diversity of housing stock in the downtown area, but were not <br />included in the exemption. He noted the problems specific to down- <br />town development leading to higher costs, such as land cost, design <br />considerations, and the restrictive fire zone. He said, also, con- <br />dominiums do not now qualify for tax abatements. The systems for <br />which the development tax is meantto provide funds already exist in <br />this area. He noted greater use of streets and sewers with minimal <br />cost to the City in the downtown area with this proposed development. <br />Thus, there was a need for offsetting costs in order to be competitive. <br />To charge again for a city system already built and paid for did not <br />seem equitable. <br /> <br />Public hearing was closed, there being no futher testimony <br />presented. <br /> <br />Mr. Haws wondered what was "Ci ty fi nanci al support. II Manager said <br />there were four kinds and read them from the ordinance. He said under <br />the present code, they are not clearly defined. Charles Kupper, HCC, <br />said Section 7.279(3} is an exclusion from the systems development <br />tax, which does not now exist. If adopted, it would offer an exclu- <br />sion from the tax which is not currently offered. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Haws indicated he did not favor giving major exemptions to any <br />particular area of town, thus he felt he should oppose Section 7.279(3}. <br />Mr. Kupper noted there are no geographic exemptions in the ordinance <br />now. He said housing projects could be subsidized in virtually any <br />area of the city. <br /> <br />It was affirmed that Sections 2.279(4} would include the treatment <br />pl ant. <br /> <br />CB 1826--Regarding land development; amending Sections 7.275, 7.277; <br />7.279, with Alternative 3; 7.281, and 7.283 of the Eugene Code, <br />1971; and declaring an emergency, was read by council bill number <br />and title only, there being no Councilor present requesting it be <br />read in fu 11 . <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2/12/79--12 <br /> <br />Ib <br />