Laserfiche WebLink
<br />and surveys, and the staff materials presented. Regarding the oppo- <br />sition because of increased tax burden, she said that is a major ~ <br />problem for all citizens. Regarding additional development, she .., <br />hoped that those who are concerned about this problem will be parti- <br />cularly involved when each particular new development is proposed. <br />She offered her assistance to any people in the area for these pro- <br />blems and/or specific projects. She had been in the area, and said <br />it is, in fact, growing and looks much like a city. Those were the <br />reasons for her supporting the annexation and rezoning. <br /> <br />B. Appeal of Hearings Official Approval of Diagrammatic <br />Stage of Goodpasture Island/Nazarene PUD (PD 78-16) <br /> <br />Approval granted by Hearings Official November 14, 1978. Manager <br />noted the location and said approval would be for 183 acres developed <br />into a density of 14 units per acre with R-2 PD zoning. The appeal <br />is by the applicants, who feel some of the conditions imposed by the <br />Hearings Official should not be so imposed. Those conditions included: <br />I} a requirement for dedication of property along the Willamette River; <br />2} requirement for improvement of bicycle path along the river; and 3) <br />requirement that the developer obtain agreement from K-Mart to relocate <br />the entrance to K-Mart parking lot to provide a common intersection <br />between the two developments. Manager said the hearing must be <br />limited to the discussion of the subject, as outlined in the appeal, <br />i.e., whether or not the conditions should be required. <br /> <br />Mr. Saul referred Council to the City Attorney's memorandum which, in <br />effect, says it is within the scope of applicable law and the City <br />Code to require dedication and improvement of the type required of the <br />developers in this case. The courts normally consider four factors as <br />to whether or not a deed requirement is reasonable, which he outlined <br />from the City Attorney's memo. He noted in a supplementary report, <br />the Planning staff's factual analysis regarding those four and other <br />contested conditions. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by <br />Councilors. <br /> <br />Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />Those speaking in favor of the appeal were as follows: <br /> <br />Harold Gillis, 975 Oak, attorney represented Goodpasture Island <br />Development Company and the First Church of Nazarene. He had not <br />received a copy of the City Attorney's opinion and, therefore, was <br />not able to respond to it. He revi ewed the three condi ti ons imposed <br />by the Hearings Official. He felt the issue was how far the City was <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />2/12/79--6 <br />