Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Lorie Loehr, 1312 Piper Lane, represented the Cal Young Nei~hborhood <br />Association. It supported the Planning staff's recommendatlons ~ <br />and the conditions imposed by the Hearings Official. Further support ~ <br />was stated for the Planning staff's trying to create greater liva- <br />bility through use of the river frontage with bike and pedestrian <br />paths. Particular support was given for the 50-foot dedication by <br />the developers. They also supported the recommendation that devel- <br />opers be required to have two major traffic signals at two entrances. <br />She noted the traffic generated will increase the traffic problem <br />with other developments occurring in that area. The conditions <br />imposed would retain livability in this area and would alleviate <br />some of the problems incurred in such developments. <br /> <br />Mr. Saul noted Council had a fairly extensive packet of written <br />materials for this particular issue. He said all the issues had been <br />covered in that information. All three issues raised have been raised <br />before the Hearings Official. An important factor regarding dedica- <br />tion along the Willamette River included that all the area involved in <br />this discussion was shown on the submitted plans as being open space <br />and recreational area. Therefore, the requirement for dedication <br />would in no way affect the design for the development in that area. <br />The City Code specifically allows inclusion of property dedicated for <br />park purposes in the overall density calculations. <br /> <br />Regarding the issue raised of uncertainty as to where the boundary is <br />located along the river and the creation of a no man's land, Mr. Saul <br />said the area between the top of the riverbank and the river's edge is <br />part of the floodway. That would not be developable land. It is <br />erroneous that this dedication would deprive the developer of some <br />developable land. The wording of the condition does allow for a <br />reduction of 50 feet, if necessary, to accommodate recreational <br />features. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />He reiterated the four basic standards regarding the reasonableness of <br />dedication in the City Attorney's memorandum. Whether or not these <br />are similar conditions as those imposed on other developers of land, <br />Mr. Saul said the City historically has required dedication of property <br />along the Willamette River, even before the Greenway Plan was adopted. <br />He gave examples of Valley River Center in 1973, and the rezoning in <br />1972 of the Thunderbird corner at Country Club and 1-105. The City <br />has had a consistent posture of requiring dedication for proposals <br />fronting directly on the Willamette River. He said the dedication <br />requirements are consistent with applicable neighborhood goals, <br />policies in the 1990 Plan and the Goodpasture Island Study, and <br />Statewide Goal 15. As to what extent the developer seeks benefit, he <br />said it does appear with the development of 2,560 units, there will be <br />some benefit to the developer. As to what extent the proposed devel- <br />opment will give rise to a public need for the dedicated land and <br />improvements, Mr. Saul said the development will be a major church <br />complex with 2,560 residential units, plus auxilliary uses generated. <br />It is extimated there will be 5,000 to 6,000 residents residing when <br />fully developed. The City has a normal standard of 15 acres per 1,000 <br />population as an objective or goal that it would hope to achieve for <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2/12/79--8 <br /> <br />12. <br />