03/12/1979 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C.B. 1841--Rezoning from County M-2 to City R-1 property located north of Jessen Drive, west of U.S. Highway 99 North was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Councilor present ... requesting it be read in full. ,., Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith that the findings supporting the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of January 2, 1979, be adopted by reference thereto; that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of- the Council; and that enactment be considered at this time. The motion passed unanimously with Brian Obie abstaining, and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18349. C.R. 1842--Rezoning from County M-2 to City M-2SR property located north of Jessen Drive, west of U.S. Highway 99 North was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Councilor present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith that the findings supporting the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of January 2, 1979, be adopted by reference thereto; that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council; and that enactment be ~ considered at this time. The motion passed unanimously with Brian Obie abstaining, and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18350. C. Concurrent annexation/rezoning property located west of Gilham Road, north of Crescent Avenue from County AGT to City R-1 (Robbins) (AZ 78-19) , Unani mously recommended by Pl anni ng Commi ss i on January 2, 1979 Mr. Saul said the parcel involved is approximately five acres, and is developed with one single-family residence and a wholesale nursery. If annexed, the owners propose to develop the property as a single-family subdivision in the same manner as the property immediately to the south and west is being developed at this time. He noted the written findings for annexation included the City's normal standards, pertinent portions of the LCDC Administrative Rule, and Statewide Goals, which would be applicable. He noted that if the annexation is approved, it would encircle four parcels of land . 3/12/79--4 13&