Laserfiche WebLink
<br />!. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />.... <br />located in the area. She urged that the City convey to the Federal <br />...::.JK-~ <br />. Government that the HAP should consider handicapped problems separately <br />from senior citizens. As HAP is now presented, they are combined. She <br />recommended the City request revision of the HAP forms so that they would e <br />indicate the handicapped population, where the funding is, and how it can <br />be allotted for those handicapped persons. She said there was a great <br />need for handicapped housing in the area, but was displeased with the <br />inadequacy of the HAP plan in addressing the needs of the handicapped. <br /> <br />Bill Uhlhorn, 2625 Hilyard, distributed to Council a letter to enter <br />into the record on behalf of several agencies. He reviewed the letter <br />and the recommendations for Council. He agreed with Ms. Knox' testimony <br />that the handicapped should not be included with the elderly, but that <br />some distinction should be made on the HAP application between the needs <br />for both those groups, as their needs are different. It was hoped some <br />distinction could be made to present the type of needs and type of facili- <br />ties which would address those needs for the handicapped. <br /> <br />Public hearing was closed, their being no further testimony <br />presented. <br /> <br />Mr. Lieuallen requested a response from staff as to how feasible it would <br />be to have some of Mr. Uhlhorn's suggestions incorporated into the plan <br />this year. He also requested a response from the Handicapped Commission. <br />Ms. Johnson replied April 17 was the deadline for submission of the HAP, <br />and it would be difficult to respond before that time. However, she felt <br />that Mr. Uhlhorn and Ms. Knox were correct that the elderly and handicapped <br />should be shown as separate items. She felt it important to communicate <br />that the document be changed to show the distinction more clearly. She ~ <br />said an addition could be made to the narrative on Table 3, but it would ',., <br />be difficult to change the data in the tables at this time. <br /> <br />Ms. Schue moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to adopt the Housing <br />Assistance Plan; that Items 4(b) and (c) as presented in Mr. <br />Uhlhorn's letter be included in Section 3-a of Table 3; and that <br />the City express its concern that a clear distinction be made <br />between handicapped and elderly in the HAP forms. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />The inclusion of Mr. Uhlhorn's letter would be as follows: No. 4(b): <br />liThe City wi 11 cont i nue to cons i der budget i ng Ci ty funds and CDBG funds to <br />provide adequate housing for handicapped individuals/families, particularly <br />where it can be shown that such funds will leverage other State or Federal <br />housing subsidies. No. 4(c): The City will seek innovative approaches to <br />the solution of housing needs for the handicapped. <br /> <br />Mr. Haws and Mr. Obie left the meeting. <br /> <br />v. Council Process For Reviewing Issue Raised By Jet Boats on the Willamette <br />River--Memo and materials distributed. <br /> <br />4/11/79--10 <br /> <br />e- <br /> <br />2..21 <br />