My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/21/1979 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1979
>
05/21/1979 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 6:15:04 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:35:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/21/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />M I NUT E S <br />EUGENE CITY COUNCIL <br />Special Meeting <br />May 21, 1979 <br /> <br />Special meeting of the City Council of the City of Eugene, Oregon, was called to <br />order by City Council President Jack Delay at 7:30 p.m., Council Chambers, with <br />the following Councilors present: Betty Smith, D. W. Hamel, Eric Haws, Scott <br />Lieuallen, Brian Obie, Gretchen Miller, and Emily Schue. Mayor Gus Keller was <br />absent. <br /> <br />I. PUBLIC HEARING--BALLOT MEASURES RE: 1979-80 TAX RATE <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />lit <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Levy For General City Operating Budget <br /> <br />Manager reviewed the history of the 1979-80 proposed budget. Origi- <br />nally, the staff asked the Budget Committee for a 7.I-percent budget <br />increase over the previous year's spending. This represented $600,000 <br />in cuts in personnel services and programs. When considered in light <br />of the II-percent inflation and 2.5-percent city growth, it was an <br />austere budget. It was discovered, however, that because non-property <br />tax revenues were expected to grow only one-half percent this year, it <br />would mean heavy reliance on the property tax. The second recommen- <br />dation of the staff to the Budget Committee was to seek a new source <br />of revenue, i.e., the real estate transfer tax. A total reliance on <br />the property tax would increase that tax by 18 percent for operating <br />purposes. If the real estate transfer tax is put into effect, it is <br />estimated that it will produce $1.6 million in revenue. This would <br />have reduced the property tax for operations to a $100,000 increase. <br />The second, less desirable suggestion was to raise the property tax to <br />a nine-percent level. This would require another $900,000 be cut from <br />the budget and from the current service level. <br /> <br />The Budget Committee, by a split vote, took two actions. They increased <br />the proposed expenditures by $400,000 to an 8.6-percent level, restoring <br />some of the cuts, and they accepted the transfer tax as well as pro- <br />posing a tax on the gross receipts of business. <br /> <br />At the last Council meeting, the Manager proposed some cuts which <br />brought the figure to $7,504,210 or 7.8 percent above the current <br />year's operating expenditures. The required operating property tax <br />for operating purposes for the City's share is a 20-percent increase <br />over 178-79. If the transfer tax were approved by the voters, the net <br />increase in property taxes for operating purposes would be $300,000 or <br />2.8 percent. If the business .tax were passed (without the transfer <br />tax), $600,000 would be needed in the operating levy, or 6.2 percent. <br /> <br />5/21/79--1 <br /> <br />ZKJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.