Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />additional jobs. Of these jobs, only 436 are in stable wood products. <br />The rest are in the service industry. These service industries could <br />relocate in Springfield. The City would lose. He urged the Council <br />to oppose the business gross receipts tax. <br /> <br />Gloria Thatcher, Weyerhaeuser Company, felt the voter would not <br />understand the full ramifications of the gross receipts tax, and urged <br />its defeat. <br /> <br />Maurie Brooks, 3351 Franklin Boulevard, spoke about how difficult <br />it would be to administer the gross receipts tax. He urged that it be <br />defeated. <br /> <br />Roger Schmaedick, 1734 West 34th Place, spoke in opposition to the <br />gross receipts tax and to the real estate transfer tax. He noted that <br />homes are sold every three to five years to families and to businesses <br />every 10 years, so this is taxing families. He wondered what would <br />happen when a house is passed through four people in an afternoon, as <br />sometimes happens, would they all be charged the tax? <br /> <br />Trish Provenski, owner of OH SHIRT!, said the business will suffer <br />from outside competition. It hires five people. She is against the <br />gross receipts tax. <br /> <br />Donald Mortenson, 2363 Todd, Georgia-Pacific, said 25 percent of total <br />gross sales are outside Eugene. The gross receipts tax will penalize <br />the large companies. Georgia-Pacific is opposed to the tax. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Donald Husband, Husband, Johnson, Fechtel & Goff, noted that, as the <br />city grows, there is nothing cheap about bigness. <br /> <br />Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony. <br /> <br />Manager, in answer to the question of how value would be determined <br />in the property transfer tax, read from the ordinance. The cost <br />of a deed changing hands three or four times in an afternoon would <br />be determined by whether it was recorded or not. Revisions could <br />be made at a later date, he noted, as far as the elderly, homesteaded, <br />and the young homeowner. <br /> <br />Mr. Flogstad reviewed the history of the gross receipts of business <br />tax. He recognized that in Portland there were some problems collec- <br />ting from outside Portland business. He said six percent of revenues <br />would be administrative costs. Mr. Obie asked Mr. Flogstad about the <br />increase from 12 percent to 33 percent that was brought out in Mr. <br />Hansen's testimony. Mr. Flogstad told him it was a third schedule out <br />of three. It was decided by the staff to use that schedule, and it <br />was presented to the Budget Committee. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />5/21/79--7 <br /> <br />281 <br />