|
<br /> .
<br /> City Code requirements are being violated. He said the City was simplify-
<br /> e ing administrative provisions of the plumbing Code and cleaning up its
<br /> language. He said this was also true of the electrical, mechanical,
<br /> masonry, and swimming pool specialty code ordinances.
<br /> CB 1940--An ordinance concerning the structural specialty code; amending
<br /> sections 8.005, 8.020 and 8.026 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and
<br /> declaring an emergency.
<br /> CB 1941--An ordinance concerning the plumbing code; amending sections
<br /> 8.555,8.556,8.557,8.560, 8.561, 8.562, 8.563, 8.564, 8.565,
<br /> 8.567,8.568,8.569,8.570, and 8.579 of the Eugene Code, 1971;
<br /> repealing present sections 8.558, 8.559, 8.566, 8.571, 8.572,
<br /> 8.573, 8.574, 8.575, 8.576, and 8.577 of that code; adding a new
<br /> section 8.572 to that code; and declaring an emergency.
<br /> CB 1942--An ordinance concerning the electrical code; amending sections
<br /> 8.075, 8.080, 8.090, 8.095, 8.105, 8.110, 8.120, 8.125, 8.130,
<br /> and 8.135 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and declaring an emergency.
<br /> CB 1943--An ordinance concerning the mechanical speciality code; amending
<br /> sections 8.495, and 8.500 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and declaring
<br /> an emergency.
<br /> CB 1944--An ordinance concerning the swimming pool code; amending sections
<br /> 8.895, 8.900 and 8.905 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and declaring an
<br /> emergency.
<br /> - CB 1945--An ordinance concerning the masonry contractor's code; amending
<br /> sections 8.415, 8.420, 8.425, and 8.445 of the Eugene Code, 1971;
<br /> repealing section 8.435 of that code; and declaring an emergency.
<br /> Mr. Henry corrected the resolution number on the agenda from Resolution
<br /> No. 3198 to Resolution No. 3200. He said this resolution related in
<br /> particular to developing a plan-check fee system which several cities
<br /> already have. Relating to item 1 on page 11, he said the City was receiv-
<br /> ing building evaluations of over $100,000 so this fee should be adjusted.
<br /> Mr. Henry, explained that the City would charge 30 percent of the building
<br /> permit fee for master plans and 50 percent for isolated buildings under
<br /> the new resolution.
<br /> Mr. Henry added that the Building Division's 1979-80 budget prOjected a
<br /> $59,000 deficit in relation to projected permit .fee and other revenue. He
<br /> said the new resolution was expected to off-set this deficit from $30,000
<br /> to $35,000.
<br /> Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, that the bills
<br /> be given a first reading and that enactment be considered at the
<br /> Council's next meeting. Motion passed unanimously.
<br /> Mr. Haws asked how the remaining deficit would be dealt with. Mr. Henry
<br /> said it would have to remain a deficit. Mr. Haws asked if the City should
<br /> e re-examine what it was doing.
<br /> 7/25/79--9
<br /> ~/Z
<br />
|