My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/08/1979 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1979
>
10/08/1979 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 11:17:03 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:37:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/8/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Public hearing was closed. <br />Mr. Lieuallen arrived at the meeting. e <br />Mr. Saul said the Planning Department and Planning Commission feel <br />that the existing RG zoning retained there permits medium to high <br />density and there is no further need for rezoning. The property that <br />extended up to Cheshire was included in the historic area designation. <br />He added that this is, at the present time, the only R-2/20A zoning <br />in the city. However, there are situations where there is R-2 zoning <br />with a ten unit/acre limit. The matter was not submitted to the <br />Historic Review Board because there was no particular correlation. <br />The Historic Review Board has reviewed the area at length and sub- <br />mitted recommendations. The Council has also accepted the Board's <br />recommendations. Staff is simply implementing what the Board earlier <br />recommended. Mr. Saul said the Council is aware that the Planning <br />Commission, when it submitted its original recommendations to the <br />Council, felt this area was appropriate for high density as opposed <br />to medium density. On the issue involving the two tax lots, it was <br />the intent to retain that area as medium-high. He would note that the <br />owners of those two lots have not been formally notified that consider- <br />ation was given to rezoning them, and so it would not be possible for <br />Council to include those at this time. <br />In answer to Mr. Obie, Mr. Saul said R-2/20A provides the maximum <br />allowable density under the Refinement Plan. Mr. Lieuallen wondered <br />about earlier discussion excluding Tax Lots 900 and 1000. Mr. Saul <br />said that when the Planning Commission reviewed the Historic Review - <br />Board's recommendations, there was discussion of that question. He <br />noted those two tax lots are part of the overall Poticha development. <br />Ms. Schue wondered if the adopted Historic District intended to <br />exclude those two lots, and Mr. Saul responded that that is a matter <br />of judgment and interpretation. Mr. Saul verified to Ms. Miller <br />that the historic review process supersedes the earlier provisions <br />of the Whiteaker Refinement Plan. The Whiteaker Refinement Plan of <br />May 8, 1978, states that the area would be zoned for residential <br />medium density, with up to 20 units per acre for the entire area. <br />The Historic Review Board recommended a portion as medium-high and a <br />portion medium on April 11, 1979. <br />CB 2007--Authorizing rezoning from R-2 Limited Multiple-Family Residen- <br />. tial District and RG Garden Apartment District to R-2/20A Limited <br />Multiple-Family Residential District with a maximum density of 20 <br />units per acre for property located in the East Butte District of <br />the Whiteaker Neighborhood between Skinner Butte Park and High <br />Street, south of the vacated east-west alley south of Cheshire <br />Street and north of the east-west alley north of 4th Avenue was <br />read by number and title only, there being no Councilor present <br />requesting it be read in full. <br /> e <br /> 10/8/79--6 <br />55/ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.