Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ <br /> at the McKenzie Bridge meeting were also shown in the report and all <br /> programs described, giving the vote of this year's goal session, as well . <br /> as a comparison to last year's voting, current action status, staff key e <br /> leadership, critical dates in the processes, and comments on deadlines and <br /> actions to be taken. Councilors were asked to review the work program and <br /> express any concerns. Manager commented on a few items. He indicated <br /> the vote tally was the same on the 1990 Metro Plan Update process for <br /> both years. He said that energy issues were first priority for the first <br /> of the year. He emphasized the importance of the T-2000 programs and <br /> the effort to have Transportation Commission consideration of the 6th-7th <br /> corridor development. He indicated the importance of the Chambers Connector <br /> proj ect. He said that one goal is for the new conference/convention <br /> ,bureau to be operating in January. He indicated efforts for improving <br /> relationships with the commissioners will continue, and double taxation is <br /> a concern of the Council. He said that last year economic development <br /> received the highest number of votes. He indicated the three areas of <br /> concern in downtown development: 1) revised plan for housing; 2) trans- <br /> portation study; and 3) the Civic Center development. Funding for general <br /> operations is an issue as well as space expansion in City Hall. Manager <br /> also indicated the processes and programs of the City Council as shown in <br /> this report. <br /> Mr. Haws left the meeting. <br /> In answer to a question from Mr. Delay, Planning Director commented that <br /> he and the Manager had discussed presenting options on central area <br /> housing for Council review by December. They would include information <br /> about the parkulation study. Mr. Delay emphasized he would like Council e <br /> to take a broad, rather than a narrow look at all those matters. Mr. <br /> Obie cautioned that those subjects not get lost in the area of economic <br /> development and agreed with Mr. Delay that all possibilities should be <br /> considered. <br /> VII. PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR INCREASE IN WATER USER'S CHARGE FOR THE CITY OF EUGENE <br /> Manager emphasized that this increase relates only to Eugene, not the <br /> River Road-Santa Clara district, and a public hearing is scheduled for <br /> October 29. He said that the City has been running into the red since <br /> 1975 in terms of supporting the sanitary sewer operations. The rate has <br /> not been increased since 1959. Councilors have also received a comparison <br /> of charges for other jurisdictions, and staff is recommending a charge <br /> equal to that of Springfield's and lower than most. Public Works Director <br /> commented that it still continues to be the best bargain in town. <br /> VIII. RESOLUTION: ADJUSTMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN EUGENE DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION <br /> AND THE CITY OF EUGENE <br /> (October 2 memo distributed) <br /> Manager said that the adjustment involves $14,000 for renovation and <br /> erection of a shel ter owned by the Universi ty of Oregon and which wi 11 <br /> be placed on indefinite loan to the EDA to facilitate activities on e <br /> 10/10/79--6 <br /> 5blf <br />