My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/24/1979 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1979
>
10/24/1979 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 10:45:15 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:37:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/24/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />- etc. He said that the landlord-tenant law gives the landlord the right to <br /> e ask a person to move in 30 days, but he feels that a person involved in <br /> the conversion of rental units would not want to have the loss of income <br /> generated by requesting people to vacate immediately. He feels that <br /> perhaps most of the tenants who were surveyed stated they did not want <br /> the conversion because they did not understand it. Rents will go up <br /> regardless of what happens. He feels this type of conversion fills a void <br /> in the market. The new home today is not affordable to many people and <br /> this conversion offers a viable alternative to someone wanting to realize <br /> the dream of homeownership. Though taxes may go up and upkeep is required <br /> with ownership, mortgage prices are fixed and costs usually are less than <br /> when renting. Vacancy rates should not increase with conversion, he <br /> said. Occupancy will be shifted in some cases, but that shifting will not <br /> destroy the available housing in the total marketplace. He also noted <br /> that approximately 250 new units are planned for construction in the <br /> downtown area. That information will be made available to tenants re10- <br /> cat i ng. He added that this is a human rights issue for everyone, not just <br /> the elderly. <br /> Whitney Scobert, 440 Blair, submitted an October 24 newspaper article from <br /> the Oregonian titled "Experts Gloomy Over Housing." The article points to <br /> government barriers and obstructions in housing construction as the princi- <br /> pal culprit in today's tight Oregon housing market. He feels this type of <br /> action must be stopped and added that elderly housing development on his <br /> own property has been prevented by the Council for two and-a-ha1f years. <br /> Ruth Shepherd, 1765 East 26th, in looking at the Patterson Tower situa- <br /> - tion, has concluded that condominium conversion is not an elderly problem <br /> exclusively. There are a broader set of issues involved. It seems to her <br /> that the problem is, in fact, a low percentage of available housing, com- <br /> pounded by the fact that there is an imbalance in the types of housing <br /> to provide a range. That imbalance should be addressed by the Council. <br /> She suggested that the process of condominium conversion should include a <br /> method to ensure that, before a rental unit is converted, there should be <br /> a percentage of available rental units assured in that area of the community <br /> before permission is granted. <br /> Betty Niven, 3940 Hilyard, felt that the major issue should be making <br /> relocation of those who will be forced to move as gentle a process as <br /> possible. She said that most residents will not want to purchase the unit <br /> if they can't do so with cash, so their choices will be moving or staying <br /> where they are if able to rent a unit purchased by an investor. It seems <br /> there could be 20 percent of the units available as rentals because a <br /> developer need only assure 80-percent owner-occupancy to get financing. <br /> When tenants are faced with the question of whether to buy and protect <br /> themselves against inflation or to move to another rental, most will <br /> decide to buy, she feels. One determining factor would be whether <br /> financing would be available at lower rates, e.g., available state pro- <br /> grams. A proposal on next May's ballot would redefine multi-family <br />e <br /> 10/24/79--9 <br /> 581 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.