Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ,.-______n__ <br /> - <br /> .- ~'-' . <br /> , " ; <br /> . <br /> constructed and paid for by this small development, and the public '.. <br /> e sewer would never be of benefit to these lots. He stated he felt <br /> there should be a provision such as a reserve strip used for street, '( , <br /> pavingt whereby the property is assessed only if the sewer is used. <br /> Mr. Teitzel stated that adjacent property is assessed even though it has <br /> a private sewer system because the benefit is assumed by virtue of the <br /> sewer line being available for future use. <br /> Mrs. Smith stated she was sympathetic with Mr. Morrison's argumentst how- <br /> ever, th,= policy is to have property owners pay for benefitting services. <br /> Ms. Miller stated she was reluctant to sit on the panel and make changes <br /> in established policy, however, she continually saw disincentives to <br /> developers of PUDls, and she felt there should be a new assessment <br /> policy in these instances. <br /> Mrs. Smith stated she would like to see staff directed to study the <br /> assessment policy towaid adjacent privately constructed seWer systems. <br /> RECOMHENDATION: levy assessment as proposed, however, that staff be <br /> directed to study possible code and policy changes <br /> for assessments to properties with privately constructed <br /> sewer systems. <br /> 5. C.B. 2028--Levying assessments for paving on McKinley Street from approximately <br /> e 200 feet north of 20th Avenue to 250 feet south of 20th Avenue; and <br /> -- on 20th Avenue from McKinley Street to City View Street (1468--78-53) C <br /> No written protests or requests to be heard were received. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: levy assessment as proposed. <br /> 6. C.B. 2029--Levying assessments for paving Best lane from lone Avenue to 1300 <br /> feet north (1494--78-62) <br /> No written protests or requests to be heard were received. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: levy assessment as proposed. <br /> . <br /> 7. C.B. 2034--Levying assessments for paving and sidewalk on Cal Young Road from <br /> Gilham Road to Norkenzie Road (844--78-28) <br /> No requests to be heard 'were received. Mr. Teitze1 brought the-Councilor's <br /> attention to a letter received from Susan Laks of 1715 Cal Young Road, <br /> wherein Ms. Laks stated she felt the City should establish a policy for <br /> extension or deferral of assessments for low income persons who are under <br /> 55 years of age. Mr. Teitzel stated that Ms. Lak's letter would be .. <br /> answered by staff. <br /> e RECOMMENDATION: Levy assessment as proposed. <br /> ('- <br /> t <br /> ASSESSMENT PANEL HEARING - 2 - December 3, 1979 <br /> toto, <br /> " <br />