My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/30/1980 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1980
>
01/30/1980 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 5:33:18 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:38:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/30/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read <br />the first time and referred to the Assessment Panel for hearing ~. <br />February 4, 1980, with Panel recommendations to be brought back ~ <br />for Council consideration February 11, 1980. Motion carried <br />unanimously with Mr. Obie abstaining. <br />I <br /> <br />v. WHITEAKER COMMUNITY COUNCIL CHARTER REVISIONS Memo Distributed, Additional <br />Information Distributed Under Se arate Cover <br /> <br />Res. No. 3306--A resolution approving and accepting the Whiteaker Community <br />Council charter amendments <br /> <br />Manager explained this was an attempt to more clearly define the types of <br />activities the Whiteaker Council can participate in. It will make certain <br />actions more accountable with respect to the expenditure of funds and the <br />election of officers. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith questioned whether the quorum of ten members was consistent with <br />other neighborhood groups. Ms. Campbell said it was. Mr. Delay corrected <br />a grammatical error--unexcused meeting--which should be changed to IIwithout <br />being excused.1I <br /> <br />In response to the Mayor's question of how expenditure of funds is handled, <br />Ms. Filer said that if the resolution is passed, different persons will be <br />dealing with each part of the financial process. They feel it will improve <br />the accountability for the funds. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to adopt the resolution. <br />Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />VI. EWEB-CiTY-LANE COUNTY LAND TRANSFER (Memo Distributed) <br /> <br />Manager indicated that there has been some problem with the statement <br />concerning joint parking in the original resolution passed by the Council. <br />He mentioned a letter from Steve McCullough of the Fair Board, distributed <br />to the Council, which indicated acceptance on their part for joint use. <br />Manager said that this resolution states that lithe City. . . and. Lane <br />County may, by future separate document, agree to joint City-County <br />parking.1I He sees this as a statement of future intent, not a binding <br />agreement, and so it should be acceptable to those concerned. <br /> <br />Res. No. 3307--Authorizing the transfer of property between the City of <br />Eugene, EWEB, and Lane County; and repealing Resolution <br />No. 3256 <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to adopt the resolution <br />and that in place of the conditions indicated as being part of the <br />deed, Lane County will provide the City with a letter acknowledging <br />the joint use of parking facilities. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1/30/80--6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.