Laserfiche WebLink
<br />c. <br /> <br />Mr. Parry listed some of the conclusions the consultants had reached: <br />1) maximum capacity of the airport's existing runway would be reached <br />in the period 1980-1985, and an additional 3,200 feet north-south general <br />aviation runway would be required by the end of that period (he showed <br />an illustration of this with a chart); 2) area problems for the public <br />and for the tenants already exist in the terminal building; and 3) by the <br />year 2000, the indication is that 400-plus aircraft will be based at the <br />ai rport. <br /> <br />Mr. Parry noted the first recommendation is to construct a general avia- <br />tion runway 3,200 feet long and 75 feet wide. In the 1972 Airport Master <br />Plan, they had recommended a location for this runway which was approved <br />by the FAA and the City Council. The location in the Update is basically <br />in the same position. Additional aircraft parking areas for based aircraft <br />need to be developed; architectural plans should be prepared for terminal <br /> <br />(e <br /> <br />expansion with construction to begin at the earliest possible date. Short- <br />term and long-term automobile parking should be expanded. The main auto- <br />mobile access road, Douglas Drive, should link Greenhill Road with the <br />terminal into a loop to the parking areas. An additional automobile <br />rental parking area should be provided south of the terminal building <br />adjacent to the baggage claim area. Discussion with the FAA should be <br />initiated to upgrade andlor relocate the air traffic control tower. A <br />new fire/crash/rescue station should be built. To be implemented at the <br />earliest possible date, in conjunction with Lane County, should be the <br />Airport Safety Zoning Ordinance (Appendix A of Update). Closure of <br />Greenhill Road is recommended in the future. Pages 837 and 838 of the <br />Plan recommend that the land in the vicinity of the airport be included in <br />the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Plan. Mr. Shelby noted this update <br />had been presented to the Council on February 6, 1980. He stated the <br />problems they were faced with were: 1) what land uses should take place <br />within the environs of the airport; 2) whether Mahlon Sweet should be <br />included in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Plan; 3) the basis for <br />determination of the location of the runway and whether the additional <br />information would cause this to be changed. He stated that this is a <br />$17.5-million developmental Plan to the year 2000, of which $4.4 million <br />of the work has been accomplished, leaving approximately $13.1 million, of <br />which approximately $3.8 million will be the "City'S share." Also, the <br />Economic Feasibility Study conducted by the consultants indicates that <br />the airport will continue to be self-sustaining. He noted that the <br />Airport Commission recommended that the Plan be approved. <br /> <br />Mayor Keller opened public hearing on the Mahlon Sweet Field <br />Master Plan Update. <br /> <br />Those speaking in favor: <br /> <br />Dan Childress, 1845-1/2 University, architect, private pilot, stated <br />that the airport provides a very good transportation service which also <br />brings non-Eugene monies }nto the airport. He felt separation of the <br />runways for general and private use to be critical. He also noted that <br />keeping the area near the airport an open space is beneficial for safety, <br />aesthetics, and growth. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2/11/80--5 <br />