Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Schue stated that a further problem seems to be that the Eugene <br />Renewal Agency policy is concerned with businesses, not with housing. ~ <br />Mr. Delay noted the variance code is specific and difficult to comply .., <br />with. He stated that he would not be in favor of changing the previous <br />decision on these six units. He felt that this would be setting an <br />extremely bad precedent. He feels that situations such as these need <br />to be looked at in a comprehensive manner. <br /> <br />Mayor Keller stated that he had two points in mind when bringing this <br />before the council. First, he felt bad about losing those six units <br />for downtown housing; and second, the council will be confronted with <br />similar proposals in the future and they will need to determine how <br />these will be dealt with. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie stated that it seems the council has moved beyond those <br />specific six units and expressed concerns regarding the total issue of <br />downtown housing and parking. He said this larger question could not <br />be resolved within the developer1s time line for these specific <br />units. He also said he would like to see staff prepare a downtown <br />parking study. Mayor Keller said that perhaps this could be addressed <br />in the near future. Mr. Henry said that staff will go to ERA and the <br />OOB and perhaps they can solve this problem. <br /> <br />H. Jefferson Pool Tour <br /> <br />Mr. Henry stated a tour of Jefferson Pool would be held immediately <br />following this council meeting. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I. Meetings <br />Budget Committee Meeting, Thursday, February 28, 7:30 p.m. <br />Joint Parks Meeting, Tuesday, March 4, 7:00 a.m., in the McNutt Room. <br /> <br />Energy Board Meeting, March 5, 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />II. ROUTINE ITEMS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL <br /> <br />A. Approval of Council Minutes of February 11, 1980, and February 13, 1980 <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to approve the council <br />minutes of February 11, 1980, and February 13, 1980. Roll call <br />vote; motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />B. Improvement Petition <br /> <br />1. Fergus Manor Subdivision (Affected Property on Petition: Assess- <br />able Costs; paving, total front footage, and front footage peti- <br />tioned 2,669.97 feet, 100 percent; sewers, total square footage <br />270,964.4 feet, square footage petitioned 230,752.0 feet, 85 <br />percent; City costs: none). <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2/27/80--4 <br />