Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />reshape district boundaries. They are as follows: 1) The owner can <br />instigate the action; 2) if the property consists of more than one <br />lot, 75 percent of all the owners can instigate this action with the <br />Planning Commission; 3) their authorized agent can instigate this <br />action; 4) the Planning Commission can initiate such action through <br />its own resolution; and 5) the City Council can request the Planning <br />Commission to consider the rezoning. He stated that the Planning <br />Department cannot ask for a rezoning of his property because he has <br />not designated them as his agent, and they are not the agent for the <br />City. He stated that, therefore, the City of Eugene has initiated the <br />rezone, and stated that the council had no jurisdiction to conduct <br />this hearing. But, if this due process is being done under the <br />quasi-judicial process from Chapter 183, he would proceed no further. <br /> <br />JoLu Roberts, 2775 Friendly, questioned the hearing procedure. She <br />asked for a definition of quasi-judicial. She further asked what type <br />of procedure was being followed under ORS 227.215. Mayor Keller <br />indicated the staff would respond to this following her testimony. <br />She stated that regarding the agenda there were several opportunities <br />for people to speak out in favor of the down-zoning and only one <br />, <br />opportunity to speak against that; she asked to be allowed to rebut <br />any testimony presented at the meeting. She asked how, if no one but <br />staff can rebut, evidence presented can be evenly weighed. Mayor <br />Keller stated that she would not be allowed to rebut presented testi- <br />mony. She stated she has three arguments against the staff application <br />to down-zone. She stated the ordinance hearing is to be just for the <br />laws to lay a foundation, but that the council is adopting its own <br />1978 resolution into a law on its own motion. She stated that this is <br />not constitutional. She further stated that approximately $1 million <br />is being taken out of the West Blair area to be disbursed elsewhere, <br />according to what she said Susan Smernoff stated at the Whiteaker <br />Community Council meeting. She further stated that to down-zone <br />during a land shortage while annexing land to the city causes the <br />council to put themselves in a bad light. She stated no down-zone <br />should occur. She further stated that the council is passing self- <br />serving resolutions like the Whiteaker Refinement Plan and conducting <br />a quasi-judicial hearing. She requested that the down-zoning at least <br />not occur without leaving a few of their precious dollars on the <br />property owners. <br /> <br />There being no further testimony presented, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Susan Smernoff stated in response to Ms. Miller's testimony that it <br />was not the intent of this rezoning to disallow development along <br />alleys in this neighborhood. She stated that many lots are large <br />enough to allow an additional single-family dwelling units to be <br />constructed, or the expansion of a single-family home to a duplex. <br />She felt that this could occur on enough lots that about 40 units <br />could be added to this neighborhood. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3/10/80--3 <br />