Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Miller said that the questions of provision of electrical services. by <br />what utility, and the question of the scenic importance of the slopes could ~ <br />also be addressed. .., <br /> <br />Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Mayor Keller asked for consensus from the council, as 10:30 p.m: was approach- <br />ing, whether they would like to continue or adjourn. Mr. Lieuallen said he <br />would like to hold over the matter of the duplexes. Mr. Long said the same <br />criteria for any other annexations would also apply as they had to this last <br />iten. <br /> <br />Mr. Obi e said he woul d 1 ike to di scuss the Block Grants. Mr. Allen said that <br />the Community Development Block Grants have a deadline so they should not be <br />hel d over. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, that the following <br />items be held over for 30 days or less. <br /> <br />Res. No. 3331--A resolution forwarding recommendation to the Boundary <br />Commission for annexation of property located between <br />Bertelsen Road and Bailey Hill Road, west of Four Oaks <br />Gr ange Road to the ci ty of Eugene and the Lane County <br />Metropolitan Wastewater Service District. <br /> <br />CB 2102--Authorizing rezoning from County RA Suburban Residential District <br />to City RA Suburban Residential District for property located ~ <br />between Bertelsen Road and Bailey Hill Road, west of Four Oaks .., <br />Grange Road. <br /> <br />Res. No. 3332--A resolution forwarding recommendation to the Boundary <br />Commission for annexation of property located west of <br />Brae Burn Drive, north of Brookside Drive, to the city of <br />Eugene and the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service <br />District. <br /> <br />CB 2103--Authorizing rezoning from County RR Rural Residential District <br />to City R-1/PD Single-Family Residential District with Planned <br />Unit Development procedures for property located west of Brae <br />Burn Drive, north of Brookside Drive. <br /> <br />Roll call vote: motion carried unanimously. <br />C. Code Amendment (mem%rdinance distributed) <br /> <br />1. Amendment would allow division of the ownership of existing <br />duplexes subject to certain conditions: change in Section <br />9.546(1)(b) to allow for smaller lot size; change in Section <br />9.548(d) specifying "duplex divisions" as a lot area exception: <br />change in Chapter 9 (Land Division Ordinance), Platting and <br />Mapping Standards, Sections 9.061(1)(a), "General Requirements," <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3/24/80--12 <br />