Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Touche, Ross, and Company is the firm whose proposal was accepted for <br />the ambulance study. MSI's financial system is based on a system developed <br />by Touche, Ross, and Company of emergency medical services from the <br />Southern California area. Roger Peese, Project Director of Touche, Ross, <br />and Company, was present at the meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay said that Mr. Leonard has voluntarily held off on a rate increase. <br />He quoted from a letter from MSI saying that the management welcomes the <br />opportunity to have the financial matter settled. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie is concerned about using Touche, Ross, and Company instead ofa <br />local company. Mr. Delay said that the Touche, Ross proposal was the <br />proposal that seemed the best and would be able to accomplish the job. <br />He said that their district office is in Portland. He was not aware of <br />any local proposals that qualified. Mr. Henry indicated that there were <br />local bids but they did not have the .experience. <br /> <br />Shirley Swenson, Finance Department, stated that there is very little <br />information on setting up financial systems for ambulance companies. <br />They also tried to find firms with backgrounds in ambulance rates. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith supported Councilor Obie's concerns but felt this study requires <br />specialized expertise. She asked where the funding for this study would <br />come from. Mr. Henry responded that it would be paid for from contingency <br />funds. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Res. No. 3342--A resolution authorizing a study of Medical Services, Inc. <br />and authorizing execution of a contract between the cities <br />of Eugene and Springfield and Touche, Ross, and Company. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to adopt the resolution. <br />Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />IX. STAFF REPORT REGARDING RESIDENTIAL LOT SIZE REDUCTIONS (Memo distributed) <br /> <br />Mr. Henry stated that this was an informational item only. <br /> <br />Bill Sloat was available to answer questions regarding smaller lot sizes. <br /> <br />Ms. Schue asked if lots sized smaller than 6,000 square feet were allowed <br />in PUD's. Mr. Sloat responded that in some instances they are. Ms. Schue <br />said she would like to look at some of these lots to get an idea of how <br />large they actually are. Mr. Sloat said he could give her the information <br />concerning their location. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie felt that the memorandum provided good background but that there <br />were no conclusions offered. He also thought the memo was too politically <br />sensitive in regard to existing neighborhoods. He thinks a 5,000-square- <br />foot lot is reasonable. He would like to refer this matter to the <br />Planning Commission and have them to propose a reduction in general lot <br />size on a city-wide basis. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />4/9/80--9 <br />