Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Lieuallen felt the present rate of seven percent should apply to <br />categories 1 and 2. It was a relatively small amount. He suggested <br />the City go to the legal limit of ten percent for categories 3 and 4. <br />He would need more information before deciding on 1980-81 projects. <br /> <br />Mr. Long explained the City has sent letters to property owners such <br />as notice of call for bids, and assessment to property owners in the <br />group of projects under category 2. This happens before council <br />awards a contract for a project. Statements in these notices include <br />"Bancroft bonding requires semi-annual payments of the assessment plus <br />interest of seven percent per year." Mr. Long said that is not <br />binding at this time for the City but it has been stated to the <br />public. He indicated that is why one alternative is to pick up the <br />deficit on the full $12.5 million. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay felt the City should not be creating a subsidy. The project <br />should be paid by the owners. There is a need to limit the City's <br />liability. They should behave like bankers. The City did not precipi- <br />tate the problem and they are subject to increases as anyone else. He <br />would advocate an ordinance to include a variable rate. He would like <br />to see alternatives for the builders. <br /> <br />Mr. Haws agreed but asked if they would say to the property owners, <br />"You can pay cash or ten percent." <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Long said a letter could be sent to the property owners indicating <br />that the rate will be increased to ten percent or the owner can pay <br />it off prior to the increase. <br /> <br />Mayor felt that there was no other alternative at this time. He would <br />add one-half percent for the City's administrative costs. The League <br />of Oregon Cities will lobby for an increase in the interest rate <br />ceiling. He would rather deal with the situation through an interest- <br />rate increase than an increase in the systems development tax. He <br />would advocate categories 2 through 4 go to ten percent. <br /> <br />Ms. Miller said this was an opportune time to look at the basic <br />development standards. She questioned whether the City's requirements <br />for streets, sidewalks, and sewers are too high for what the City can <br />afford, thereby creating a need to finance the projects. She asked <br />council to look at the basic regulations. <br /> <br />Mr. Lieuallen agreed that council should look at this question. <br /> <br />In response to the Mayor's question, Manager indicated that on a <br />statewide basis they are conferring with bond counselors and the <br />League of Oregon Cities. <br /> <br />Mr. Teitzel added that if a decision is not reached until June, <br />EWEB and other utilities would be unable to complete all projects at <br />that time. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />4/16/80--7 <br />