Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />element that would really be involved for providing services to the River <br />Road/Santa Clara area would be police services since all the others are con- <br />tracted anyway. Mr. Obie noted he was concerned because it seems like an. <br />endorsement of urbanizable land development. Mr. Delay stated that Policy 10 <br />relates to NO.7 and institutionalizes that what has happened in Santa Clara can <br />happen anywhere. Mr. Farah noted that Policy 12 has major administrative <br />problems and applies only to Santa Clara and the north Springfield area. Mr. <br />Croteau noted the example of Chevy Chase, which was platted at urban density. <br />Streets and drylines for sewers and storm sewers were in place so it had been <br />preplatted for urban service delivery. Ms. Miller asked why Santa Clara resi- <br />dents could not just be told straightforwardly that the City is not going to <br />annex their area right now, but would annex River Road. Mr. Obie suggested <br />replacing Policy 12 with Gretchen's statement. <br /> <br />Mr. Farah stated that policy 17, particularly on page III-G-6, needs to be <br />worked on more. He added that Policy 16 relates to the Mohawk Valley and Policy <br />18 relates to the Lane Community College basin. <br /> <br />Public hearings will be held on May 29, 1980, at 7:30 p.m. and on May 31 from 9 <br />a.m. to noon and 1:30 to 4:30 p.m. at the round agriculture building at the <br />Fairgrounds. <br /> <br />Meeting was adjourned to May 27, 1980. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />. ~)~ <br /> <br />Charles T. Henry <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Lynda Nelson) <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />CTH:LN:so/CM26al <br /> <br />5/21/80--12 <br />