My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/21/1980 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1980
>
05/21/1980 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 6:15:14 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:40:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/21/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />D. . Approval of Council Minutes of April 28, 1980, and May 5, 1980--Ms. <br />Smith noted that on the April 28, 1980, minutes, on page 10, section <br />D, paragraph 4, there is an error. The language should read "Ms. e <br />Smith said she had been contacted but did not consider it a conflict <br />of interest." <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to approve the <br />amended council minutes of April 28, 1980, and council minutes <br />of May 5, 1980. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />E. Improvement Petitions--Mr. Henry stated that the first three improve- <br />ment petitions that thelcouncil would be dealing with relate to <br />streets; the second three petitions to be dealt with relate to private <br />property. On all of these petitions, the plan is to require the <br />petitioner to pay engineering costs as they are accrued by the City <br />and collections will be in the current year. Mr. Gilman noted the <br />subdividers had agreed to do this. Subdividers can proceed with the <br />design work if they are willing to pay in advance for the costs, then <br />they will have to take their chances as to whether the council will be <br />able to Bancroft the contracts at a later time when the bond sales <br />market is more favorable. <br /> <br />1. Sundial Plat (affected property on petition: assessable costs; <br />paving: total front footage and footage petitioned 2,131 feet, <br />100 percent; sewers: total square footage 351,544 feet, total <br />square footage petitioned 335,544 feet, 95 percent; City costs: ~ <br />none) .. <br /> <br />Res. No. 3339--A resolution authorizing street paving, sanitary sewer, <br />and storm sewer construction within Sundial Plat (1673). <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to adopt the resolu- <br />tion. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />2. Esmeralda Subdivision (affected property on petition: assessable <br />costs; paving: total front footage and front footage petitioned <br />1,240 feet, 100 percent; sewers: total square footage and square <br />footage petitioned 141,159 feet, 100 percent; City costs: none) <br /> <br />Res. No. 3340--A resolution authorizing street paving, sanitary sewer, and <br />storm sewer construction within and adjacent to Esmeralda <br />Subdivision (1735). <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to adopt the resolu- <br />tion. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />5/21/80--4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.