My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/28/1980 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1980
>
05/28/1980 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 6:19:29 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:40:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/28/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The city councils of Eugene and Springfield will be involved. A 4It <br />full hearing regarding the level of service has not happened. He <br />feels Eugene should ask to get together with Springfield for a joint <br />hearing of concerns of involved individuals to be able to look at the <br />long-term problem. Mr. Obie indicated his agreement with Mr. Delay in <br />regard to the joint meeting with Springfield. He feels this meeting <br />should develop standards and procedures, but that the labor dispute <br />at MSI should be omitted from this hearing. He has a strong bias <br />against creating another public agency. An in-depth study needs to be <br />undertaken. Ms. Smith indicated that Dr. Dickenson's offer of assis- <br />tance from the Lane County Medical Society would be helpful. Mr. <br />Lieuallen stated a public hearing for the general issues should be <br />held and that the size and scope of the task force should perhaps be <br />expanded. There is a need to move cautiously and carefully. Ms. Schue <br />indicated agreement and stated that perhaps the task force should <br />include the Medical Society and Springfield, as well as others. <br />Mr. Haws indicated he noted a reluctance to increase the size of the <br />task force. Mr. Delay stated that these issues enlarge the scope of <br />the task force; he felt it better to have more members of the elected <br />bodies from the jurisdictions involved. Technical people should be <br />involved for information on the rate structure. There needs to be a <br />public hearing on the level and quality of service. Mr. Henry sug- <br />gested communicating with Springfield and Lane County about scheduling <br />a joint meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. McGuire stated that he would like to have something together 4It <br />by next week. The license is up for renewal on July 1. Mayor Keller <br />stated there needs to be information accumulated to determine whether <br />or not the service is good or bad. Mr. Delay indicated he does <br />not feel the Finance Department can answer questions on how to <br />judge service delivery in the community. The licensing requirement <br />is an operator issue. There are significant issues that have been <br />discussed and he would like an opportunity to hear this soon since <br />there is a crisis in the community. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie asked if a subcommittee could be formed to come back with a <br />plan of action in a week or two. Ms. Smith indicated support for <br />this. <br /> <br />Mayor Keller indicated he and Mr. Henry would get together with <br />Springfield and Lane County, then with the councilors. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie stated he would prefer that the councilors meet first and <br />then meet with Springfield and Lane County. Mr. Lieuallen stated <br />his agreement with Mr. Obie's proposal. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />5/28/80--2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.