Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Lieuallen stated he would like a staff response on Councilor <br />Delay's proposal and on cooperatives. Mr. Obie stated agreement with <br />this and said he would like additional information on the tax issue. <br />Ms. Miller stated she would like to see work done on the preparation <br />of language for Delay's proposal and asked if Section 11 on page 45 <br />(permit waivers) would pose a significant problem. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith stated she felt the task force should get together one more <br />time to clarify points raised at this meeting. Mr. Delay stated he <br />would like an opportunity to have this brought back at the June 11 <br />council meeting. Consensus was to further discuss at the June 11 <br />council meeting: 1) the Delay proposal; 2) the question of coopera- <br />tive inclusion; and 3) the taxation issue, in order to provide staff <br />direction in these areas. Mayor Keller responded that it could be the <br />first item. <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />Proposed Euthanasia Ordinance--Mr. Henry stated this is the ordinance <br />requested by Councilor Delay which conforms with the initiative <br />petition passed earlier. It is not the same as the County ordinance <br />nor the ordinance under study and development by Tri-Agency. He <br />introduced Stan Long~ City Attorney's office, to provide background <br />informat ion. <br /> <br />Mr. Long stated that in May 1978 the County initiative measure regu- <br />lating the killing of dogs and cats in shelters was passed. He noted <br />that councilors received a copy of this as well as a copy of the Lane <br />County Code and a copy of the ordinance requested by the council. The <br />County measures do not automatically apply within the city of Eugene <br />since it is a home rule city. This ordinance would limit the killing <br />of dogs and cats in pounds and shelters within Eugene to injections of <br />pentobarbital by 1 icensedveteri nari ans and animal techn ici ans. <br />Veterinarians in private practice would be limited to using injection <br />methods but it does not specify the drug that would be used. This <br />does not limit what owners can do with dogs and cats, nor what can be <br />done in defense of property or person. <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />Speaking in_favor: <br /> <br />Jeffrey Sherman~ 3315 West 13th, stated he was one of the original <br />sponsors of the 1978 ballot measure. The limits would be injection of <br />sodium pentobarbital by licensed and trained personnel. Opposition to <br />this measure came from Tri-Agency, Lane Humane Society, and the Lane <br />County Veterinarian Society. This measure was to limit use of the <br />decompression chamber. After the initiative measure was passed by the <br />voters the Lane County Commissioners changed po~tions of the ordinance <br />in September 1978, since Greenhill Animal Shelter and the Tri-Agency <br />Board objected to the wording regarding "certified" personnel. <br /> <br />6/9/80--15 <br />