Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CB 2140--An ordinance concerning animal control, amending Section <br />4.355 of the Eugene Code~ 1971; adding Section 4.450 to that <br />code; with a 60-day effective date. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be read the <br />second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of <br />the council. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Miller stated she feels there needs to be strong rationale for <br />changing an initiative ordinance but feels that people with proper <br />training and supervision can probably handle the situation just as <br />well. There is an obligation to the voters, however~ to abide by <br />their decision. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay stated he feels it should be made quite clear that no "foot <br />dragging" is expected from staff on this issue. There is an obliga- <br />tion for Tri-Agency management to do everything they can to recruit <br />trained animal technicians. He wants the schools that will have <br />graduating classes of animal technicians to be notified that there <br />are positions available. He does not feel that recruitment would be a <br />problem and thinks it could be done in 30 days~ although he does not <br />want to quibble over 30 versus 60 days. <br /> <br />Mr. Lieuallen asked if the Personnel Department would be doing the <br />recruitment. Ms. Williams responded that Tri-Agency does their own <br />recruiting. Mr. Lieuallen noted he would like a very strong commit- <br />ment that policy direction will be carried out regardless of staff <br />feelings. He felt there would be more ability with the City Personnel <br />Department but since they do their own recruitment at Tri-Agency he 4It <br />wants to make certain that the policy direction will be carried out. <br /> <br />Mayor Keller noted that Tri-Agency is a cooperative effort and feels <br />this should go through Springfield and Lane County for review. He <br />indicated that just because Tri-Agency is located within Eugene does <br />not give the City the right to force this on the other jurisdictions. <br />The priority is animal control. Mr. Delay responded that there was an <br />overwhelming vote by voters of the county that this be passed. Ms. <br />Smith stated the policy board would be meeting again within the week <br />and wondered if they would be looking at this ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay noted the policy board had taken action on two items at <br />previous meetings: 1) They had unanimously adopted Commissioner <br />Rust's proposal to hire an animal technician for a kennel supervisor <br />opening; and 2) through attrition, having all personnel become animal <br />technicians. He stated he does not accept the position of the manage- <br />ment team that they can give a better alternative than what was passed <br />by the voters and the testimony tonight has not changed his mind. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />6/9/80--18 <br />