Laserfiche WebLink
<br />There are several pertinent definitions, one of which is common <br />elements which means existing for the benefit or common use of <br />more than two units or share owners, and comparable housin~ which . <br />involves seven factors used in determining whether a unit lS compar- <br />able (such as size, gross rent, and number of bedrooms with others <br />~equiring the exercise of judgment requiring similar heating and <br />cooling systems, kitchen and bath facilities, special facilities for <br />special category tenants, and accessibility to community services. <br />The last four factors must be similar but do not require exact equiv- <br />alency). Conversion is defined as a situation where two or more <br />rental housing units sharing a common element are converted to <br />separate ownership interests. Cooperative housing units would be <br />living units having separate kitchen facilities. Late in the deli- <br />berations of the task force, it was decided to include cooperatives <br />so this form of housing could not be used as a means for bypassing the <br />condominium conversion process. The Director of HCC can waive partic- <br />ular requirements for cooperatives in particular situations. A waiver <br />can only occur if there is an adopted administrative rule identifying <br />a particular regulatory requirement as equivalent. The tenants cannot <br />waive their rights but they can be negotiated. He added that there is <br />a $500 conversion fee per unit. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay stated it has been a pleasure to work with the task force <br />and the public in these open discussions. The council has expressed <br />its concern that they not stand in the way of new multi-unit construc- <br />tion, so he proposes to exempt from most regulations of the condominium <br />ordinance units that are less than ten years old and were constructed <br />after 1975. This would be primarily those who have conversion as part <br />of the financing package. He requested staff to come back with a ~ <br />proposal on this matter. : <br /> <br />Mr. Obie stated concurrence with Mr. Delay. He feels that elimina- <br />tion of most requirements except for the special category aspect is <br />an excellent one. He questioned using both a ten-year figure and <br />construction after 1975. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay indicated the ten-year stipulation would apply to future <br />construction. Mr. Obie asked if this would encourage people to <br />convert prior to the building becoming ten years old. Mr. Delay <br />stated that it would; if the financing package includes conversion <br />in the first ten years then this would not stand in the way of that <br />financing proposal. Mr. Obie wondered if they would be better off <br />to eliminate the ten-year stipulation and indicate that those units <br />built in or after 1975 are only subject to the special category <br />requirements. Then they would not be encouraging conversions within <br />the first ten years. Mr. Delay stated this could eliminate the impact <br />of the conversion formula. Ms. Smith stated she supports Mr. Delay's <br />suggestion for staff to bring back additional language. Mr. Lieuallen <br />asked how the conversion formula would be affected under this formula. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />6/9/80--8 <br />