06/11/1980 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all coun- cilors present voted aye; the bill was declared passed and numbered 18645. CB 2130--An ordinance "levying assessments for paving and sanitary sewer on Elizabeth Avenue from Jessen Drive to Beltline Road (79-21) Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all coun- cilors present voted aye; the bill was declared passed and numbered 18646. CB 2131--An ordinance levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer within and adjacent to Braewood Hills Subdivision (79-30) Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all coun- cilors present voted aye; the bill was declared passed and numbered 18647. CB 2133--An ordinance levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer within Garfield Heights Subdivision; on Hayes Street from 25th Avenue to 25th Place; and on Garfield Street from 25th Place to approximately 300 feet south (79-20) e Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all coun- cilors present voted aye; the bill was declared passed and numbered 18648. CB 2132--An ordinance levying assessments for paving sanitary sewer on . Seneca Road from 1st Avenue to 11th Avenue (78-29) was referred back to the Hearings Panel. III. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF APPEALS FROM,DETERMINATIONS OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS HEARD BY THE HEARINGS PANEL ON APRIL 21, 1980 Findings from the Hearings Panel upholding the Zoning Board of Appeals decisions to: 1) grant a variance to the University Street Church of Christ at 2820 University Street; 2) deny a variance to allow relocation of an accessory workshop building addition to within two feet of an interior property line; and 3) deny a variance to allow the creation of an attached carport with no setback from an interior property line. e Mr. Delay said that one appeal deals with an accessory building. Neither he nor Ms. Smith could establish findings to support the variance request but neither did they feel that the way the property owner was dealt with was the proper way to handle a small outbuilding on a piece of property. Mr. Delay asked Bernard Gilkison, Public Works Department, if this item were moving toward resolution. Mr. Gilkison responded that it is. He had met with the owner and has some alternatives for him. 6/11/80--11