07/14/1980 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ms. Smith asked whether in regard to the Planning Commission's recom- mendation about Richard Lane, Richard Street, and Jerry Street, there was any consideration given to eliminating Royal Avenue as well. e She also wanted to know if there was consideration given to people opposing the sidewalks. Mr. McKinley noted that the Planning Commis- sion toured the area and chose Royal Avenue rather than Richard Street. Res. No. 3396--A resolution adopting the recommendations contained in the Eugene Sidewalk Program Draft Report (December 1979). Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to adopt the resolution. Mr. Obie stated that he was in favor of sidewalks and thinks they can add to neiqhborhoods, but is concerned about thi s being a "neat package" and does not think the answers to the questions are that simple. The sidewalks should be put in one at a time. In regard to industrial areas, there should be language like, "where appropriate." He feels there should be hearings on the specific streets. With costs today, by adopting the package, costs are being imposed on people and he would like for them to have recourse. He would like to see the sidewalks move ahead, but cautiously. Mr. Haws noted that he agrees generally with the policies of the plan. He asked if they would be adopting the policies and then looking at each project as it comes up. This would give them the ability to look at each individual project. Mr. McKinley responded that there would be two hearings for each sidewalk. Mr. Haws noted that if the tit process is not begun, it will never go anywhere. " Ms. Miller noted that good pedestrian access is important, but not necessarily a strip five feet back from the curb line. These projects will be council-initiated improvement projects. High priorities are being focused on first, and if Royal residents do not think it is high priority, that is acceptable; but it may cost them more later than if it were done at this time. She is concerned about people on fixed incomes. Mr. Obie asked if there is reason to believe that there will be block grant money available. Mr. Farah responded that there would not be NIP funds, but perhaps there might be individually funded improvement projects. Mr. Obie noted that a final decision was not being made on Royal Avenue tonight. Mayor Keller responded that it would come back to the council later. Mr. Obie asked if the indus- trial section is yet to be written. Mayor Keller responded that it was. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Mr. Obie asked if a response could be brought back to the council regarding grant avail abil ity. Mr. Farah responded that it could. e 7/14/80--13