07/16/1980 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . - Marge Beck, staff for Tri-Agency, stated that Mr. Delay did a good 'job of - explaining the situation. The City would recover the costs more slowly in this manner and the Policy Board agreed. Mr. Obie asked if the City has budgeted for this and Mr. Henry responded that they have. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to authorize the City Manager to execute an amended 30-year Tri-Aqency lease agreement, contingent upon the agreement of the other jurisdictions. Ms. Beck noted that Springfield has already approved this. VII. PAYMENT OF BILLS AND CLAIMS Mr. Henry said that due to the change in fiscal years, it is necessary to approve the payment of bills and claims according to the particular fiscal year. At the July 14, 1980, council meeting, the council approved the bills and claims through the end of June 1980, and this resolution would authorize payments of bills and claims incurred from July 1, 1980, through July 16, 1980. He noted that a listing of bills and claims has been distributed. Res. No. 3400--A resolution authorizing payment of bills and claims for the period July 1, 1980, through July 16, 1980. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. e Meeting was recessed to the McNutt Room for Item VIII--Metropol~tan Plan Update. VIII. METRO PLAN UPDATE Mr. Croteau noted that the memo distributed outlined the major disagreements with Lane County. They are: 1. Issues relating to conversion from urbanizable to urban land, and provision of key urban services; 2. Land uses around the airport; 3. Jurisdictional boundary and responsibility and text agreement to seek plan amendment within jurisdictional boundary. He stated that the memo has been given to the Springfield City Council for amending and adopting their own plan. Their adoption of the amended plan will take place on August 5, 1980. One plan is desired that will represent complete agreement between Eugene and Springfield. Mayor Keller noted that they had strived for unanimous agreement but they were unable to obtain it; Lane County was not in agreement. In regard to policy 12 on page II-B-5, Mr. Delay stated that it is implicit that it would have to be designed to meet proposed density requirements and Mr. Croteau assured him that it would. Mr. Farah said that this would be accomplished through the Public Works Department. Mr. Delay asked if it was correct that development would not occur without concurrence and Mr. e 7/16/80--11