My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/03/1980 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1980
>
09/03/1980 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 12:10:33 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:42:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/3/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />the city's limits. Mr. Greenleaf responded that it could and is sometimes <br />used as a leverage in securing resolution and is a way of directing City <br />resources. Mr. Delay asked if that would be termed punitive. Mr. Green- <br />leaf responded that it would. Mr. Delay asked if staff work has been done . <br />yet as to the type of enforcement order. Mr. Greenleaf responded that it <br />has not. <br />Mr. Delay asked if this order could be directed at only the areas of <br />di sagreement. Mr. Greenleaf responded that this has been done. Mr. De 1 ay <br />asked what kind of notice would be given to jurisdictions if a punitive <br />action were to be considered. Mr. Greenleaf stated that our staff would <br />receive copies of the enforcement order being considered by the commission, <br />a public hearing would be held, and then the commission would decide if <br />that were appropriate. Mr. Delay asked if it would be effective for the <br />building season next spring. Mr. Greenleaf stated that building goes on <br />throughout the year so that might not be a fair statement to make. It <br />probably would go into effect 120 days from the time the order was prepared, <br />but it could be done faster. <br />Mr. Haws expressed concern that if this process would reach the punitive <br />stage, it sounds as though it would only apply to the cities and not the <br />county. Mr. Greenleaf stated that this could apply county-wide, but that <br />is unlikely. Mr. Haws said it sounds as if this would occur within the <br />urban service boundary but not outside it. Mr. Greenleaf stated that it <br />depends upon the conflict. There has not been a situation like this <br />before. Mr. Haws suggested that the process, if it reached the punitive <br />step, be applied to the complete geographical district involved. <br />Mayor Keller said that if there is a moratorium it seems that development e <br />within presently approved areas could continue. Mr. Greenleaf stated that <br />the City is operating under a plan not approved by LCDC. They woul d take <br />into account that Eugene has an acknowledged plan but that does not <br />prohibit an enforcement order. Mayor Keller stated that if a moratorium <br />were declared, that he would like to know how the City could continue to <br />operate. He noted that they would need to contact the City's legal staff. <br />Mr. Greenleaf reminded him that these are hypothetical situations so <br />responses are vague. <br />Ms. Smith stated that if the approved plan were not to be recognized, <br />the council might object. Mr. Greenleaf stated that he had thought that <br />they might. Ms. Smith asked what kind of communication LCDC has had with <br />the County reg~rding their adoption of the plan and then later objecting. <br />Mr. Greenleaf stated they have discussed this with the County Commis- <br />sioners, who stated that Eugene and Springfield might concur with Lane <br />County's version and then object to portions they disliked. <br />Mayor Keller asked if the urban growth boundary normally applies to <br />cities. Mr. Greenleaf stated that it would apply to all urbanizable <br />areas. <br /> 9/3/80--6 e <br /> ......." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.