Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. , <br /> Mr. Obie asked if the $1.75 charge includes a capital reserve charge. <br />. Mr. Cook responded that it does not. Mr. Obie asked if the $1.95 <br /> charge includes a capital reserve charge. Mr. Cook responded that it <br /> does not. Mr. Obie did not feel the capital reserve charge was hidden <br /> in any other charges. Mr. Obie asked why the users' charge would be <br /> increased now when the pl anti s not fi ni shed. Mr. Cook responded <br /> that: 1) it is a change of policy in how the City calculates staff <br /> support costs; 2) that this will provide additional MWMC staff at <br /> a cost of $339,000; and 3) that there is a shift from the general <br /> fund into sewer utility fund. Mr. Obie commented that since the $2.50 <br /> monthly charge was not enough, this is the reason for the new charges. <br /> Ms. Miller asked if the $1.30 figure in capital reserve could change <br /> over the next few years from capital reserve to maintenance. Mr. Cook <br /> responded that it could. Ms. Miller asked what would happen if the $5 <br /> were insufficient for operation and maintenance expenses for any <br /> particular year and if it would be possible to use the capital reserve <br /> fund. Ms. Racette stated that the user charge is to cover operation <br /> and maintenance expenses and if that is not enough, the funds to cover <br /> these expenses would come out of the capital reserve fund. They would <br /> have to check with the State budget and audit laws to make certain <br /> that is legal. Ms. Smith noted that would be a policy decision the <br /> commission would have to make. If that were the case, they would use <br /> the funds for operation and maintenance. She did not believe that the <br /> $5 charge would be increased. Mr. Henry stated that as the plant is <br /> built it will require more people to operate it. The staff will be <br />e about double that of the combined Eugene and Springfield plants <br /> currently. Mr. Lieuallen asked why more personnel are needed. Ms. <br /> Racette responded that this is a larger, more sophisticated plant <br /> requiring more highly skilled personnel. Mayor Keller noted that this <br /> plant will operate 24 hours per day which will have some bearing on <br /> the matter. Mr. Henry stated that the quality of output requires more <br /> personne 1 . Ms. Smith stated that the commission has not yet deter- <br /> mined who would operate the plants. The hope is that it would be <br /> contracted with existing staffs. Mr. Lieuallen asked if the $1.30 <br /> charte would accumulate the $2.5 million. Ms. Racette responded that <br /> the 1.30 is not a firm figure; it will be whatever is not needed for <br /> operation and maintenance. Less money will be available as mainte- <br /> nance costs increase. The 1981-82 amounts would total about $2.5 <br /> million. Mr. Lieuallen asked if either of the other two charges would <br /> be going into the capital reserve fund. Ms. Racette responded that <br /> the regional charge would not. Mr. Cook noted that the local charge <br /> will be to maintain the local system. Mr. Lieuallen asked if the hope <br /> is to create a $2.5 million reserve. Mr. Cook responded that that is <br /> correct. <br /> Mayor Keller noted that there is a question regarding whether River <br /> Road residents will pay their fair share. Mr. Cook stated that with <br /> the connection charge, they will attempt to offset additional costs to <br /> current residents. <br />e <br /> 9/22/80--11 <br />