Laserfiche WebLink
<br />----- <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~ Mr. Farah stated that issues regarding growth management were identified in <br />~ the council goal-setting session. The council continues to be aware of the <br />need to manage growth, as too little or no growth could raise difficult issues. <br />Eugene has no growth-limit policy. Eugene's policy since 1972, with approval of <br />the 1990 Plan, has been to manage growth geographically. This report deals with <br />the socio-economic systems of growth management. The community has addressed <br />this issue in the Metro Plan. Eugene and Springfield have supported having a <br />study done for the mentropolitan area on a growth rate management system. <br />Lane County has been less supportive. The impact of a growth management system <br />that shifts growth into the metropolitan areas could mean a lack of a tax base <br />and other difficult i.es. Any growth management rate system must go beyond the <br />urban growthboundarTes~here is a need to know how much land will be necessary <br />to accommodate growth in a timely manner. Economic development can occur with <br />the City's policy. This report was developed by Economic Consultants Oregon, <br />Ltd., after looking at various cities. <br /> <br />In Ramapo, New York, there was no growth rate system; rather, they used geo- <br />graphic management for development of services. Although no limits to growth <br />were established, services were only provided to certain areas, which has <br />resulted in a shift in growth away from the city. Boca Raton, Florida,was a <br />population capital. The growth policy of the city caused them to go to court. <br />There has been a shift in growth to nearby communities. In Boulder, Colorado, <br />they have a point system like Petaluma, California, which also causes a shift to <br />nearby jurisdictions but allows for slow growth. Petaluma's system is based <br />upon geographic management of the rate of growth based on the number of building <br />permits issued, which has caused higher housing prices and a shift of growth. <br />~ In Davis, California, a change in building permit criteria has created a new <br />shift toward multi-family dwellings. Fresno, California, has no system. <br />In San Jose, California, the geographic management system has caused an exten- <br />sion of the urban services. In Salem, Oregon, geographic management has caused <br />inter-agency extension of services. Staff concurs that growth rate management <br />has effects on the surrounding communities as well as within the city. It also <br />sets up commuting patterns. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson stated that no one seems to have done the type of analysis that <br />the council is interested in, probably because there is not easily available <br />data. The 1980 census data will be available soon. He distributed preliminary <br />Lane County data which shows the preliminary population counts and percentages <br />with change from 1970 to 1980. On the basis of this information, he said it <br />appears that some growth has shifted to the surrounding communities. This may <br />have already occurred due to the council.s growth-rate policies. The census <br />data should give more accurate information. Eugene has a better monitoring <br />system. Since 1977, they have been developing an inventory of developable <br />1 and. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay asked why North Springfield and River Road are shrinking. Mr. Carlson <br />responded that these areas were developed in the 1960's with less development <br />in the 1970's. There is also a decline in household size. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />e <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 27, 1980 Page 5 <br />