Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> "' <br /> the council requested that weatherization of existing residences on a mandatory <br /> basis be brought back to them in ordinance form. Improvements have been made to <br /> the ordinance since the original draft, but it basically remains the same as it <br /> . was in March. Adoption by the EWEB Board to provide financing for weatheriza- <br /> tion is very important. He introduced Jean Reeder. <br /> Ms. Reeder stated tbat the program has not yet been implemented, but it was <br /> adopted May 27, 1980. It will provide for zero-percent-interest loans for <br /> electric space-heat customers, matching grants for the most cost-effective <br /> measures installed by electric space-heat customers, low-interest loans for <br /> non-electric space-heat customers, availability of loans and grants for both <br /> landlords and tenants, provisions for loan payback at the time of sale for elec- <br /> tric space-heat customers or on a monthly payment schedule which may be assumed <br /> by any resident, and it will be totally independent of the ordinance with the <br /> exception that all proposed housing code measures will be covered by the finan- <br /> cinq program. On November 17, the Oregon State Attorney General's office issued <br /> the opinion that there is no need to change the Oregon Constitution nor to pass <br /> enablinq legislation in order for public utilities to offer conservation finan- <br /> cing. A test case pursued by EWEB has resulted in a Circuit Court ruling on <br /> December 2, 1980, and the judgment declares that the financing program does not <br /> violate the Oregon Constitution, State statutes, or the City of Eugene Charter. <br /> They expect that the Circuit Court decision will be appealed to the Oregon Court <br /> of Appeals, and they expect that a decision at that level will be made within <br /> two to six months. Voter approval of a revenue bond measure will be necessary <br /> to provide funds for the financing progam. This could go before the voters as <br /> early as March 31, 1981. They expect to be able to offer a financing program by <br /> the end of 1981. <br /> . Mr. Page stated that the financing proposal will be available for rentals as <br /> well as owner-occupied dwell"ings; it will be available for oil and natural gas <br /> customers; it will be effective for the rate-payer; and there will be no effect <br /> on the property tax. This ordinance would not become mandatory until 1985. <br /> Within the next four years, the board thinks that most residents will volun- <br /> tari ly comply. For those who do not comply by January 1, 1985, it would become <br /> mandatory. This ordinance would affect residential structures from single-family <br /> up to four-plexes. Of those dwellings, it would affect only those built before <br /> July 1, 1974, and they must meet the prescriptive standards which would be <br /> listed as part of the Eugene Housing Code: <br /> This ordinance is very different from the goal adopted by the City of Portland <br /> last year. It does not affect the sale of property; it is not dependent upon <br /> the availability of State or Federal funds; it only affects residential units up <br /> to four-plexes; there is a prescriptive code clearly defining what is necessary; <br /> administrative costs for inspection and enforcement will have a minimal finan- <br /> cial impact upon the general fund or property tax; and the utility will complete <br /> and certify the inspections. Only when new tenants or buyers request a change <br /> of service would the ordinance be enforced. There would be no effect upon those <br /> who live in homes who do not have housing code inspections. However, it would <br /> be a good incentive to weatherize for those on fixed incomes since it would save <br /> them money on utility bills. <br /> . MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 17, 1980 Page 5 <br />