Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Lieua11en said he would support the motion. The applicant's forecast of the <br /> likelihood of the building being razed under the current zoning persuaded him. .. <br /> The City is committed to uses of that kind in that area. The City is working <br /> with the neighborhood and it is hoped the City can help with traffic and pollu- <br /> tion problems. <br /> Mr. Delay thought they had come a long way in the relationship between the <br /> developer, the City, and the neighborhood group. He recollected a conflict <br /> between a developer and a neighborhood group that resulted in the deannexation <br /> of an area. The conflict between the two policies is something the council and <br /> the Planning Commission have to deal with. It is nice to know,he said, that <br /> there are people in the neighborhood willing to participate and deal with these <br /> conflicting goals. He hoped the WNQP pursues annexation. It was through their <br /> efforts that mixed-use zoning was put in place. He agreed with Mr. Lieua11en <br /> and would support the motion. <br /> Ms. Miller observed that the church would be a difficult building to adapt for <br /> residential uses. This is an effort to reconcile a difficult situation to save <br /> the building. Without contract zoning, the council will have to hope that is <br /> what will happen. She wanted to note that the highest zoning potentially under <br /> MU is R-4. As a council, they might want to consider whether R-3 might be more <br /> appropriate under MU. It is an ordinance amendment that they should keep in mind. <br /> Roll call vote. The motion carried unanimously. <br /> Council Bill 2229 was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieua11en, that the bill be . <br /> approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All coun- <br /> cilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and <br /> numbered 18737. <br /> 4. Property located south of West 11th Avenue on the west side <br /> of Oak Patch Road from M-2 Light Industrial District to C-1/SR <br /> Neighborhood Commercial District with Site Review procedures, <br /> including a sign district boundary change from Industrial District <br /> to Outlying Commercial District (Gary Hughes) <br /> (Z 80-28) (map distributed) <br /> Mr. Henry noted the application was approved by a unanimous vote of the Planning <br /> Commission. He introduced Jim Croteau. <br /> Mr. Croteau stated that the property was located on Oak Patch Road south of West <br /> 11th on the north of the Amazon Channel. All the property north is zoned M-2 <br /> except the property directly to the north. Land to the south is R-2/PD and is <br /> in multiple-family apartments. The Planning Commission noted that it was a good <br /> location for a neighborhood commercial facility to serve the expanding popula- <br /> tion in this general vicinity. They were concerned about the configuration of <br /> the parcel (116 feet in depth) and asked for site review procedures to review <br /> the proposed development of the property. <br /> . <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 22, 1980 Page 6 <br />