Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />was in the Transportation Improvement Program for 1982-83 construction, but in <br />order to coordinate construction with the East Bank lnterceptor, staff has <br />advanced the paving project to 1981-82. This will authorize street paving, <br />sanitary sewer construction, and storm sewer construction on Country Club Road <br />from 1-105 to Willagillespie Road and on Willagillespie Road from Country Club <br />Road to 300 feet south of Clinton Avenue, and storm sewer construction in the <br />area between Country Club Road and l-105. The project calls for a 46-foot-wide <br />street with curbs and sidewalks in most locations, no parking, and on-street <br />striped bicycle lanes. This project will be done in two phases. ln 1981, <br />the eastern portion of the project will be built and the remainder of the <br />project including completion of Willagillespie Road and improvements to the <br />intersection near Valley River will be done in 1982. A portion of the road <br />near Delta Highway will be realigned to remove three existing right angle bends <br />and to improve safety for motorists and residents. This will also result in <br />substantial cost savings in the construction of the East Bank lnterceptor. <br />The realignment will require right-of-way acquisition of several parcels. The <br />cost will be assessed to the adjacent property according to the City Code. <br />They estimate the County portion will be around $960,000 and the City's share <br />will be approximately $288,000, which will be included in the proposed 1981-82 <br />budget. <br /> <br />Mr. Hamel asked if the obligation of the property owners is for a 46-foot <br />paved street or if their obligation is only for 26 feet or for 28 feet. Mr. <br />Teitzel responded that the obligation is 20 feet for a single-family dwelling <br />and 36 feet for a multi-family dwelling. <br /> <br />4It Mr. Lindberg asked if during the public testimony the affected parties approved <br />the improvements. Mr. Teitzel assured him that information had been given to <br />them and that they were told they could come before the council with any con- <br />cerns. Ms. Wooten asked about the amount of the right-of-way purchase cost for <br />those four lots. Mr. Teitzel responded that four residences and four lots are <br />involved as well as some miscellaneous frontage and the City has budgeted <br />$500,000 for acquisition. Ms. Wooten asked if this is in addition to the cost <br />of the project. Mr. Teitzel responded that it is. Ms. Wooten asked if this is <br />a $2.2 million project. Mr. Teitzel responded that it is. Ms. Wooten asked if <br />the County has agreed to pay the $960,000 portion of the project. Mr. Teitzel <br />stated that the County would act in February. Ms. Wooten asked if the $816,000 <br />assessment to the property owners would change much. Mr. Teitzel responded that <br />it would not. Ms. Wooten asked how many property owners were affected. Mr. <br />Teitzel re~ponded that he did not know. Ms. Wooten asked why the full develop- <br />ment of this project would be. Mr. Teitzel stated that it would be as listed in <br />the Metro Plan for full utilization. Ms. Wooten asked why this project was <br />pushed up. Mr. Teitzel responded that it was because of the construction of the <br />East Bank Interceptor which will tear up part of the road and it will save money <br />to do this paving project now. Ms. Wooten indicated that she would like infor- <br />mation on the individual assessment costs. She said that her concern was for <br />the individual owners. Mr. Teitzel indicated he did not have that information <br />readily available. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MlNUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 26, 1981 <br /> <br />Page 11 <br />