My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/23/1981 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1981
>
02/23/1981 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 5:42:13 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:45:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/23/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />boundary; it is contiguous with the city on the east and south. The Metro- <br />politan Area General Plan designates the area as appropriate for low-density <br />residential development and the property can be served by sanitary sewers, <br />water, electricity, fire and police protection, and schools in the area. Jim <br />Hanks, Traffic Engineer, was available to discuss the traffic aspects relating <br />to the proposed development. This application includes a tentative street <br />layout for access from the Rexius property to 40th Avenue, which is to the <br />north. That proposal indicates that a road could be constructed to 40th Avenue <br />without exceeding the maximum street grade criteria. Such a street is desirable <br />to provide dual vehicular and emergency access to the site in existing and <br />future development at Edgewood Mountain PUD which is immediately to the south. <br />The Planning Department received annexation proposals today for property to the <br />north of the Rexius property extending to 40th Avenue. However, this proposal <br />should be reviewed on its own merits. The Planning Commission considered this <br />annexation request at a public hearing November 4, 1980, and voted to recommend <br />approval of the request to the City Council. Included in the motion was direc- <br />tion to the staff that it submit minutes of the commission hearing to the <br />Hearings Official, along with letters from neighbors when PUD plans are reviewed <br />for the site, and to suggest to the Hearings Official that development be <br />limited until dual access is obtained. Randy Thwing of the Planning Commission <br />is available to answer questions. <br /> <br />Jim Hanks, Traffic Engineer, stated that existing traffic on Brookside at the <br />intersection with Brae Burn is about 400 trips per day. The annexation, fully <br />developed, would add about another 800 trips per day to the volume on Brookside, <br />for a total of 1,200 trips per day. The proposed development from Edgewood <br />Mountain would add another 500 to 600 trips per day, for a total of 1,700 to <br />1,800 trips per day. The capacity is about 6,000 trips per day, and this <br />development would bring existing volume up to about one-third of the practical <br />capacity. There is a 22-percent grade going from Brookside into Brae Burn, <br />which is higher than existing City standards, and is about the maximum grade <br />that City fire trucks will climb. They can climb that slope, but it is very <br />difficult for them to do so. There are no recorded accidents at this intersec- <br />tion, although minor accidents may have occurred and not been reported. Traffic <br />volume of 1,700 trips per day means that during peak hours there would be about <br />170 to 180 vehicles going through the intersection per hour. This is not a <br />substantial traffic volume from a capacity point of view. Neighborhood resi- <br />dents usually begin complaining about volume when traffic volumes reach approx- <br />imately 700 cars per day and there is more noise. However, when traffic volumes <br />are substantially higher, people usually do not complain. <br /> <br />Ms. Schue asked how long a "day" is. Mr. Hanks responded that it is 24 hours <br />and that the readings are done on Thursdays when school is in session. Mr. <br />Lindberg asked what the possibility of the proposed street would be in terms of <br />improving fire access. Mr. Hanks responded that it probably could be made <br />better, and this would provide an additional route. Mr. Lindberg asked if <br />the sharpness of corners and the slope are factored in when determining street <br />capacity. Mr. Hanks responded that these are taken into account. Mr. Lindberg <br />asked if parking on the side of the street is taken into account. Mr. Hanks <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 23, 1981 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.