My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/15/1981 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1981
>
04/15/1981 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 6:01:17 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:45:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/15/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Obie asked if they could have a delay of one week in order to ascertain the <br />kind of testing that had been done previously. Ms. Wooten replied that since <br />the previous testing, the character of the neighborhood had changed, creating <br />more traffic. A number of elements are different than the prior configuration <br />when the diverters were tested. She would not object to a delay of one week as <br />long as they could go ahead without further delay at that time. <br /> <br />Ms. Miller suggested asking the Public Works Department to delay the installa- <br />tion until next Wednesday. She recalled the old barricades and thought it was <br />similar to the one proposed. She agreed that the character of the neighborhood <br />due to Monroe Park and the traffic is different from before. Alternative <br />methods of traffic diversion are worthy of discussion but should be considered <br />separately. <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason said staff would bring back an explanation to the council at the <br />next meeting of what had been done in the past, what they were planning to do at <br />this time, and what will be accomplished. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten said that it was agreeable as long as they considered the neighbor- <br />hood and the new considerations that exist there. She did not want council to <br />decide whether or not to test the diverters, since they are part of an approved <br />plan, without the ability of residents to respond. <br /> <br />Councilor Obie requested information on the significance of the park as well. <br /> <br />Manager said that they would be on the agenda as an informational item. A <br />decision would be made only after the appropriate public process. <br /> <br />B. Letter of Thanks to Don Nelson <br /> <br />Ms. Smith noted that Don Nelson, who had covered the City Council for the Eugene <br />Register-Guard for four years, left without council having the opportunity to <br />show their appreciation. She requested a letter be sent thanking him for the <br />four years of coverage and wiShing him well. The council concurred. <br /> <br />C. Announcements <br /> <br />Ms. Miller noted on May 21, 1981, the County Commissioners had requested a joint <br />meeting with Springfield and Eugene city councils. She .anticipated sending a <br />letter of acceptance and asked if there will be any objections or comments from <br />council. There were none. <br /> <br />Ms. Miller asked for volunteers to serve on the joint task force with EWEB. <br />D. Agenda Adjustments <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason added an item to the agenda on the matter of a mini-retreat for the <br />council. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />April 15, 1981 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.