Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Cityls Garbage Board, getting them involved and asking them to meet more fre- <br />quently. The council should explore ways to have the Garbage Board be more <br />active. The City has, in theory, a structure that should be doing these pro- <br />jects. She did not want to duplicate the Garbage Board with another structure. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lindberg, to show interest in <br />cooperating with the County in dealing with the issue of solid <br />waste reduction, by virtue of requesting two slots on the Resource <br />Recovery Advisory Committee. A staff person, contingent upon the <br />approval of the City Manager, and a City Councilor would represent <br />the City on the Lane County Resource Recovery Advisory Committee. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten asked Ms. Miller about the Garbage Board. Ms. Miller said that <br />she would like to see the board work more closely with the County by having <br />joint meetings, doing a better job of liaison, so that they could develop and <br />implement the policies when the time comes to do it. Solid waste problems dealt <br />with at the County level should be considered from the City point of view. The <br />County has to deal with problems county-wide as far as Florence. They have a <br />different scope of the problems. <br /> <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />VII. CONSIDERATION OF OPTION AGREEMENT FOR 38TH AND HILYARD LANDBANKING SITE <br />(memo distributed) <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason introduced Greg Byrne, Department of HCC. Mr. Byrne explained <br />the Cityls landbanking program as one of the Joint Housing Committee's highest <br />priorities. What they do is to seek out sites that meet council's dispersal <br />policy for low-income housing. They purchase those sites and hold them for <br />development of low- and middle-income family projects. The 38th and Hilyard <br />site is the first venture into this program. Over a period of two years, they <br />have received direction to proceed from the Portland office of HUD using Federal <br />Section 8 funds for rent supplements. Within two days of the final approval, <br />funds were frozen by the current administration in Washington, eliminating the <br />Cityls ability to proceed with development of the site through a private <br />developer. Staff and the Joint Housing Committee propose optioning the site to <br />the Lane County Housing Authority who will act as property developer. The <br />intent of the program and the outcome of the program would be the same: to <br />provide low-income dwelling units on that site. The Joint Housing Committee <br />suggests optioning the site for a period of six months. During the six months, <br />Lane County would compete for housing funds through HUD available to them and <br />not to the City. Within the six months they would show substantial progress <br />toward securing the financing. If they were not successful, the City would <br />retain title and control over the property and seek funds from another source. <br /> <br />Mr. Hamel asked about item 2, where it states, "therefore the City agrees to <br />exempt the Housing Authority from special assessments." Mr. Hamel asked what <br />assessments. Mr. Byrne said street improvements, upgrading of storm sewers, <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />April 22, 1981 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />