Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Smith referred to testimony that those who seceded from WNQP had formed <br />their own organization. She asked Ruth Miller to comment on this. Ruth <br />Miller said that the area that had seceded formed its own downtown association <br />which was in existence for about a year and was a recognized neighborhood group. <br />There had been problems with elections, meeting notices, and definition of who <br />could vote, and the Eugene Planning Department had recommended that recognition <br />of the group be withdrawn because of these problems, because it was felt that <br />the group was not meeting the needs of people in the area, and because the group <br />was in violation of its charter. <br /> <br />Councilor Lindberg asked for clarification on testimony that had suggested that <br />neighborhoods have veto power. Mr. Gleason responded that neighborhood groups, <br />like other City boards and commissions, are only advisory to the council and <br />only make recommendations. They have no veto power. <br /> <br />Councilor Wooten said that she had given serious deliberation to the concerns <br />of the business community regarding this issue. She felt that the interests <br />of businesses and residents in the area are not mutually exclusive and that <br />the two groups can maintain a cooperative and enlightened neighborhood organiza- <br />tion. She therefore supported the proposed extension of the WNQP boundary to <br />Charnel ton Street. She felt that having a downtown merchant's association for <br />the area, to work on a consistent and open basis with the neighborhood group, <br />would be very helpful. <br /> <br />Councilor Miller felt that in an area with mixed uses, there is always going to <br />be difficulty in pleasing all factions on all issues. She noted that the <br />methods, tone, and style of doing business of most neighborhood groups have <br />changed considerably in the past ten years. Anti-business and anti-developer <br />attitudes which once prevailed in some neighborhood groups have, for the most <br />part, given way to general concern for city-wide economic development and job <br />potential. She therefore did not feel that businesses in the area proposed for <br />annexation to WNQP needed to fear harassment or anti-business attitudes~ Ms. <br />Miller agreed with Ms. Wooten's suggestion that a near-in westside merchant's <br />association be formed to represent businesses in the area both at neighborhood <br />and at city-wide meetings. <br /> <br />Ms. Miller wished to correct the impression made in some of the testimony that <br />neighborhood groups are decision-making bodies. She said that this was not the <br />case and that neighborhood groups only have the power to make recommendations. <br />She added that those who feel that recommendations made by any neighborhood <br />group were arrived at by an inadequate process or by a segment not representa- <br />tive of the real feelings in the area, should state this at public hearings and <br />let the decision-making body then decide how much weight to give the neighbor- <br />hood's testimony. Ms. Miller said that the residents in the subject area <br />deserve representation by a neighborhood group. She therefore supported <br />extension of the WNQP boundary. <br /> <br />Councilor Lindberg said he felt that everyone needs the opportunity to be <br />represented by a group, and that he would therefore support expansion of the <br />WNQP boundaries. He noted that the WNQP charter allows businesses the unique <br />opportunity to be represented both by a neighborhood group and by a merchant IS <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 11, 1981 <br /> <br />Page 17 <br />