Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r\ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />4. Royalwood First Addition (affected property on petition--assessable <br />costs: paving, 100 percent; sewers, 100 percent; City cost, none) <br /> <br />Res. No. 3509--A resolution authorizing street paving and sanitary sewer <br />construction in Royalwood First Addition and sanitary sewer <br />construction within 160 feet of the south and west boundaries <br />of Royalwood First Addition (1921). <br /> <br />Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to adopt the resolution. <br />Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />5. Wolf Meadows Subdivision (affected property on petition--assessable <br />costs; paving, 100 percent; sewers, 100%; City costs, none) <br /> <br />Res. No. 3510--A resolution authorizing street paving, sanitary sewer, and <br />storm sewer construction within and adjacent to Wolf <br />Meadows Subdivision (1771). <br /> <br />Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to adopt the resolution. <br />Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />III. PURCHASE OFFER FOR CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION TO FINANCE COMMUNITY <br />CONFERENCE CENTER (memo attached) <br /> <br />Mr. Whitlow introduced ,Jeff Tashman of the Department of Housing and Community <br />Conservation. Mr. Tashman presented an update on financing arrangements for the' <br />Conference Center. He said that it had been staffls intent to present a bid on <br />the certificates from E. F. Hutton. He indicated that instead staff would <br />provide information to the council recommending that the matter be postponed for <br />a week. <br /> <br />Mr. Tashman introduced Jim Gibbs of E. F. Hutton. Mr. Gibbs explained that he <br />had expected to have bids on the certificates by this meeting, but that due to <br />shifts in interest rates, he had only received orders on 30 percent of the <br />certificates at an 11.75-percent rate. He said that he would recommend that his <br />firm continue marketing the certificates and adjust prices on the unsold por- <br />tion. He said that given the experience on May 12, 1981, of the State of Oregon <br />in its marketing efforts, it was felt that a better rate might be obtained. He <br />cautioned that there was some risk attached to this, as there is always the <br />possibility that the situation could worsen rather than improve. <br /> <br />Mr. Gibbs introduced Rebecca Marshall, Loan Department of First National <br />Bank of Oregon. Ms. Marshall said that she had been acting as a financial <br />consultant to many municipalities in their efforts to market certificates. She <br />distributed an article and accompanying graphs from the May 4, 1981, issue of <br />The Weekly Bond Buyer. She said that it appears interest rates will continue to <br />grow, but that no one will predict how much. She discussed several major <br />factors which could be used by councilors in evaluating the decision on post- <br />poning marketing the bonds for another week. Ms. Marshall indicated that if the <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 13~ 1981 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />