Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be read the <br />second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent <br />of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. <br /> <br />Ms. Miller asked Mr. Thwing to comment on the Planning Commission's discussion. <br />Mr. Thwing explained that the Planning Commission vote had been in favor of the <br />staff proposal by 5:1, with Mr. Pearson voting no. There had been considerable <br />discussion on the 30-percent figure and on whether that figure should be <br />increased. A vote had been taken to increase that figure to 40 percent, but the <br />motion had failed in a 3:3 tie. Mr. Thwing personally had opposed the motion, <br />because he saw no evidence to support increasing the figure above that suggested <br />as a good starting point by staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Lindberg suggested that the ordinance could specify that the lot size be <br />planned as if 30 percent of the cars would be compact, but that the developer be <br />allowed to stripe the lot for up to 50 percent compact cars. This would mean <br />the land was available to regress to more of the larger spaces if that proved <br />necessary, but that meanwhile more spaces could be allotted for compact cars. <br />Mr. Farah said that staff's aim has been to keep the program as simple as <br />possible. The program will be reviewed in a couple of years. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Smith suggested that Mr. Thwing ask the Planning Commission to accelerate <br />the review time for the program from two years to one year. Mr. Thwing agreed <br />to suggest this to the commission if all goes well this first year. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith asked if in its discussion the Planning Commission had addressed <br />the question of reducing the number of required parking spaces in addition to <br />the size of the spaces. Mr. Obie responded that this issue would be addressed <br />in the zone code update which is currently in progress. Mr. Farah agreed. <br /> <br />Rolf call vote; motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Council Bill 2287 was read the second time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be approved <br />and given final passage; with an automatic call for a two-year <br />review. Roll call vote; all councilors present voting aye, the <br />bill was declared passed and numbered 18800. <br /> <br />D. Annual Review of the Eugene Bikeways Master Plan (memo distributed) <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason introduced Charles Nordgaard, Public Works. Mr. Nordgaard listed <br />the 14 proposed changes to the Eugene Bikeways Master Plan as: <br /> <br />1. Addition of a general policy statement regarding new arterials. <br /> <br />2. Addition of a route on Terry Street from the north city limits to <br />Barger Avenue. <br /> <br />3. Addition of a route on Danebo Street from Royal to West 11th Avenue. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />4. Addition of a route on 1st Avenue from Bertelsen to Seneca. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 26, 1981 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />