06/08/1981 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e Mr. Lindberg stated that this is a difficult decision. His feelings are consis- tent with the Planning Commission recommendation, and rather than overthrowing the refinement plan, the council is simply interpreting that document in con- junction with the General Plan. He indicated that he would vote yes. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Council Bill 2309 was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18812. C. Parade Permit Ordinance and Administrative Rules Revision (memo, ordinance, administrative rules distributed) This item was held over to a future council meeting as noted earlier. D. Public Works Bid Awards (tabulations attached) Mr. Gleason introduced Bert Teitzel, Public Works. e Mr. Teitzel stated that these bid awards as proposed are for six different projects. Staff is recommending that all bids be awarded to the low bidder. Project 1 is for paving and sidewalks on Goodpasture Island Road, which was included in the TIP for 1980-81, and was also included as a recommendation from the School Safety Committee. They have received complaints from owners of four lots dealing with double- or multi-frontage assessments. The code allows for equal-odd assessment if all property owners that are affected agree. Projects 2, 3, and 4 are all 100 percent petitions from property owners and Projects 5 and 6 are storm sewers that are part of the Capital Improvement Program with no assessments. Public hearing was opened. Speaking in opposition: Donald Husband, 72 West Broadway, distributed information to the council. He indicated that he lS the attorney representing Joe Romania, Milan Raykovich, Carl Raynor, and Berri, Inc., owners of Tax Lots 1900, 2000, 2100, and 2200, respectively. He is filing a protest by reason of the proposed assessment which the City Council is contemplating making in connection with Goodpasture Island Road for Tax Lots 9, 8, 7, and 6 of the third addition to Flintridge Subdivi- sion. This protest is being filed on the basis that there is no benefit and can be no benefit to those four tax lots. All of those properties have sewers, water supply, and paved streets either fronting or abutting the properties. They do not feel that construction of any paving, sidewalks, or storm sewers would benefit any of those lots nor would such improvements increase the market value. He feels that the council should visit that area if they have not already done so. It is impossible for any of those four lots to get any benefit because immediately joining this road and at the rear of those four lots, there e MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 8, 1981 P ag e 13