My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/08/1981 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1981
>
06/08/1981 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 6:22:15 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 5:46:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/8/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />there would be to reopening it. The council will need to base their decision <br />upon the considerations dealing with aesthetic standards versus hindrance of <br />free-flow of traffic in the downtown area. They also need to consider pedes- <br />trian safety and the economic advantages or disadvantages that are involved. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Speaking against: <br /> <br />George Boehenke, 2040 Willamette, submitted petitions containing approximately <br />300 signatures. He began his testimony by recalling when the community passed <br />the ballot measure to start the Performing Arts Center. A group of people got <br />together and put their money on the line. They thought that Willamette Street <br />would remain completely open. They wanted it left open to generate downtown <br />business with a new hotel and auditorium. The majority of major retailers <br />downtown want service organizations downtown but most have moved out because <br />traffic has been cut off. Most people coming in to Eugene from 1-5 cross the <br />Ferry Street Bridge and go down 6th. That is the major connector to downtown. <br />He had gone to the Eugene Downtown Association, Chamber of Commerce, and the <br />City Manager and asked that the sign directing people to the downtown area be <br />changed to direct people to use 8th Avenue temporarily. No one would do that <br />because they wanted the Hilton to locate here. Traffic linkage is needed for <br />the downtown area. Many peop 1 e go down 6th Avenue and on out and take the <br />Washington/Jefferson Bridge to Valley River Center. The survey Les Anderson <br />took which alluded to a small amount of traffic was done between 10 a.m. and 2 <br />p.m., not between 7 and 10 a.m. when people are there in the downtown area <br />for other business such as going to the post office. The post office antici- <br />pates 5,000 post office box holders by 1985 or 1990, which would be a lot of <br />people to shove out of the downtown area, who would be potential shoppers. <br />Surveys taken in Fresno and other cities have shown that business does come back <br />to the downtown area once streets have been reopened. Ada Lee, owner of Asia <br />Garden, could tell the council of the hardship this closure has placed on her <br />business, as could the owners of Original Joe's. He feels that temporary <br />barricades could be used during performances such as those that are used in <br />Portland. There is a need for the movement of traffic. <br /> <br />Keith Rodman, 2004 East 26th Avenue, stated that State statutes allow the <br />council to initiate street vacations and this is what was done in this case. <br />State statutes define affected areas as those geographic areas closest to the <br />street being proposed for closure. This is the first opportunity there has been <br />for property owners from the "affected area" to testify. All the private <br />property owners on Willamette Street from 5th Avenue to 8th Avenue on both sides <br />have been contacted. Unanimously, they signed a petition to keep Willamette <br />Street open. He has al so tal ked to tenants and lessees of the II affected area" <br />and most of them feel it is vital to their economic welfare that the street be <br />open. They feel an important north-south traffic artery is severed with this <br />closure. With the closure, traffic movement is not convenient as it takes eight <br />to ten blocks, rather than two and one-half to three blocks, to go from the post <br />office to the downtown core area which is wasteful of fuel. He has questions <br />concerning the legal implications of this proposed street vacation. As he <br />understands it, by vacating this public street, one-half of the street would be <br />owned by the Hilton and they can do with it as they please. He does not know if <br />the City has utilities running under the street, but if they do, the City will <br />no longer have that easement if the vacation occurs. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />June 8, 1981 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.