Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> , <br /> c <br /> e Ms. Smith said the Convention Bureau needed an annual budget allocation that it <br /> could rely upon and one which did not depend upon passage of Eugene and <br /> Springfield budgets. She said all the comments at this meeting would be brought <br /> to the task force for its review. <br /> II. REPORTS FROM BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> Mr. Lindberg reported that the Renewal Plan Advisory Committee decided at its <br /> last meeting to recommend no expansion of the current downtown renewal project. <br /> He said the committee was considering creation of one or more additional renewal <br /> districts and the two areas under consideration were the 5th Street Special <br /> District and the renewal agency property on Broadway between Lincoln and <br /> Charnelton. Mr. Obie commented that the Eugene Renewal Agency would be having a <br /> retreat soon and the City Council would be invited to lunch so comments on the <br /> direction of the renewal agency could be shared. <br /> Ms. Smith reported on the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission. She <br /> said the possibility of any Federal funding was unknown and the commission was <br /> pursuing every possible option for funding. She said an additional $50 million <br /> was needed to complete the plant. <br /> Ms. Wooten commented that any help at the Federal level would come from Senate <br /> action because the House had no funds in its budget recommendations for <br /> wastewater treatment plants. Ms. Smith said even if $2.4 billion were allocated <br /> at the Federal level, the portion for Oregon would never meet the needs. Mr. <br /> e Gleason said if the allocation were earmarked just for plants in progress, it <br /> would be an 8-year program. He said the Federal administration clearly wants <br /> out of this sort of business. <br /> Ms. Smith said the commission was not sitting around waiting to see what would <br /> happen but was working hard to generate funds from other sources. Mr. Lindberg <br /> said perhaps the entire project would have to be scaled down if no funding can <br /> be found. Ms. Smith agreed the commission had to come to grips with that <br /> possibility. <br /> Mr. Obie asked if the City had any possibility for suing to recover money <br /> promised by previous administrations and congresses. Ms. Smith said the costs <br /> involved in any kind of court action were prohibitive. Mr. Gleason said that <br /> furthermore the Federal government on a civil issue of this nature would have to <br /> agree to allow the City to file suit, and it certainly would not do that in this <br /> case. He said, in addition, there was no entitlement to past appropriations, so <br /> there is essentially nothing to sue about. He said Congress appropriates funds <br /> from time to time, and that a present congress was not bound by the appropriation <br /> decisions of previous congresses. He said there was much uncertainty as to what <br /> congress is going to do this year, and that without this information it was <br /> difficult for the commission to decide whether to consider a scaled-down project <br /> or not. <br /> e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 13, 1981 Page 5 <br />